At first I read this and was outraged, but it might and can be used as a good lesson to make sure you take care of your own.
Remember the old saying/cliché: “Charity starts at home.”
Right now the government is in the charity business and those that do not take care of the home front are in fact standing before the government with their hands out.
The 0bamacare law includes a section on confiscation if one takes on Medicaid.
The government’s welfare system is not a charity system. If one let’s the village take care of the family, then the village owns all that you have; because the village bought and paid for all you have.
Charity starts at home and take care of your business.
We’re discussing debt that was unknown to the “debtor.” If the so-called “debtor” never had a chance to “take care of their business” and was unaware of any debt, that somehow makes THEM responsible?
Only in a fascist state.
Taking care of your own is one thing. Putting a gun to someone’s head and robbing them to pay a debt incurred by another person, relative or stranger, is theft.
You are operating under the false premise that this process is fair and rational. It is not.
Do you really think all those Mexicans my wife has to work with, and who get $5,000 to $10,000 'refunds' even though they only pay a few thousand in taxes to begin with, will be included? You're delusional.
The government’s welfare system is not a charity system. If one let’s the village take care of the family, then the village owns all that you have; because the village bought and paid for all you have.
Yup, this is something that the ObamaCare drones don't publicize at all, and I keep hearing about stories where parent's who can't get their kids covered on the BarkyCare exchanges are told to just sign the kids up for Medicate... I wonder when the government is going to confiscate the parent's home after the kids have some major claims?
And if the parents go on medicade, the kids will be liable for paying for it, even after the parents die!
Mark