Posted on 04/10/2014 7:41:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
i cannot make sense of this... somebody help me, please!
Thom Tillis, the choice of the GOP-e, is the only Repub contender who trails Hagan in polls... but he appears to be headed for the nomination.
The RINO Party needs enough Senate members to over ride any Vetoes that Obama will do of anything they pass. Because we all know if they vote to discontinue ObamaCare, he will Veto that bill. They have to have the votes to over ride his Veto. Without enough total votes, they are basically worthless.
Dimocrat low info voters information.
The GOP-e has their person picked already, and Hagan is ahead of that person in the polls. There are several GOP hopeful candidates that GOP voters like more than the GOP-e choice, but the GOP is not interested in what the voters want... particularly GOP voters, and even more particularly, conservative GOP voters.
How far behind are Bannon and the other contenders? I haven’t seen much polling data. I did see Lee endorse Bannon and some other good publicity for him from conservative media and organizations.
...Which is why I believe RINO behind-the-scenes treachery will doom any chances of taking over the Senate. The GOP-e would rather see an easy win for a conservative in the general election morph into a sour defeat, just for the momentary satisfaction of saying, "See? We told you only moderates can get elected now!"
We can only override any vetoes of that arrogant pos if we get the majority. Without it we don’t have a chance. I hope you realize that. If not, than you are the problem.
Isn't North Carolina alone putting that old canard to the lie? The GOPe choice is the only one trailing the incumbent RAT.
Get out the vote time!
Walk the streets — make it happen.
Suppose the GOP gets the majority and still doesn’t override any vetoes of that arrogant pos.
Who would be the problem then?
Suppose the GOP gets the majority, doesn’t override any vetoes of that arrogant pos, and passes amnesty, and that arrogant pos signs it into law.
Who would be the problem then?
People who continue to believe that the GOP is on their side
when it is clear, apparent and obvious that it is not are the problem.
I hope you realize that.
Oh, their comeback to that is "it's all in the messaging."
thank you for that explanation... btw--this is truly dumb... others are polling better than she is, but they cannot beat the one guy who is trailing her... ridiculous...
Why wouldn’t they want to override any vetoes? But then you know it takes two thirds to override vetoes. That means unless we get the super majority of 67 votes in the senate we can do it without the rats
What have they done up to this point that illustrates in any concrete manner that they are against Obama in any way at all?
Furthermore, not only do you need the rats to reach 67, you also need the rinos, so it isn’t going to happen.
The ONLY thing the GOP has stated solidly that it wants to do is pass Amnesty, and that is exactly what they will do, and Obama will sign it.
This country’s problems are not going to be solved via an election or elections.
That is all.
The South is very conservative. Yet, Tokyo Rove and the gOpE doesn't make any distinctions by state but sees all of these races like they are Minnesota, Wisconsin or Connecticut and choose to run/support the squishiest moderate possible, instead of the authentic conservative. FAIL.
And then he and his minions in the supposedly conservative press yell that the Tea Party is splintering the gOp because they object to having Rove's RINOs crammed down their throats?!!!
North Carolina is a great example (LA and AR not as good of an example since there is little disagreement over the GOP candidate), as are the states where Rove is backing gentrified incumbent fossils rather than great new candidates - Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, Kentucky ....
Yes! And these 'winners' put the old canard to the lie as well ....
Connie Mack IV (FL); Rehberg (MT); Berg (ND); Smith (PA); Allen (VA); Raese (WV); Thompson (WI) ...
I hope you realize that a simple majority can control the money and nothing works without it. The House alone can cut the funding, but Boehner refused to even consider that option.
It is the Money that makes it all go, and the House alone can stop it!
Cut off the money and you will see if we want freedom or slavery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.