Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

I’ve read one article in which the man claimed his family had had access to that land back to the late 1800’s. Any idea if that’s true?


76 posted on 04/09/2014 4:35:42 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

According to Bundy’s daughter on FB her gr-grandpa paid for pre-emptive rights to the land in 1887. He then sold those rights to his son and he gave them to Bundy.

The BLM was paid grazing fees to help him manage the land but they stopped using the fees for management and started using it to buy up the other lands. Bundy refused to sell and basically fired them. He tried to pay fees to Clark County but they refused.

Bundy used his own equipment, labor and money to manage the land over the years...no tax dollars! He has been to court to defend his actions and as the BLM has tax money to spend they kept after him. Lastly, they have used the protected species act to get his land.

I think his basic claim to graze on the land is that it’s between him and the State of Nevada...not the Feds business. I agree.


81 posted on 04/09/2014 5:00:44 PM PDT by JouleZ (You are the company you keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson