I have many other quibbles besides that piece of trash Amash. Tea party express is wrong much the time and always in the tank for Paulbots.
Kerry Bentivolio, like Amash, is a member of the Paul wing of the party. His presence in Congress is a fluke due to McCotter's abrupt departure leaving him the only Republican on the ballot. We're lucky he didn't lose the general election, he lost the simultaneous special election for the rest of the term which was conducted under the old lines and against a different, better, rat opponent than the one that ran for the full term. He's a poor fundraiser and ripe for defeat by a strong democrat challenger. I endorse his primary opponent Dave Trott, who has out raised him.
Conservative Senator Pat Roberts doesn't need to be replaced at all, let alone with a cypher from out of nowhere like Cousin Milt.
Massie doesn't appear to have a primary challenger so I don't know why he's been endorsed. He's another Paulbot, wish he did have a challenger.
In LA-6 it wouldn't surprise me if Paul Dietzel was a Paulbot but I'm by no means certain he is. The important thing there is stopping ultra-RINO State Senator Dan Claitor. Black conservative Trey Thomas is an interesting choice.
In FL-19, Palin's choice of Lizbeth Benacquisto seems right to me. Classon seems like one of those random guys who does nothing but shout how "tea party" he is and attack his opponents for the nerve of having a record in the state legislature. He also won the support of the seat's former occupant, Connie Mack the lesser. Boo.
The others I agree with, I think Alex Mooney is a very interesting choice for WV-2. He was a promising State Senator across the state line in Maryland until he lost in 2010 of all years (his district must have been souring or else his rat opponent the Mayor of Fredrick was too popular). He might be getting some flack for recently moving to WV.
What do you think of Chad Mathis?
Oops, I should’ve said I agree with “some” of the endorsements, not the bulk of them, as they clearly are Paulbots. I don’t agree with Wolf in KS or Mooney in WV (who blew a safe state Senate seat in MD, losing in 2010 (!) to an extreme left moonbat, and fared poorly as state party chairman before quickly pulling up stakes and carpetbagging over to the state).
Nobody's right all the time.
And I take issue with the statement "always in the tank for Paulbots." Completely untrue.
Otherwise, thanks for your well thought out comments!
National Review’s Jim Geraghty made a very good point in today’s “Morning Jolt” (his daily e-mail for which one can sign up for free) regarding the importance of a candidate’s actions matching his words:
“Positions Don’t Define Politicians, Actions Do.
Way back in 2007, then-Senator Barack Obama was making statements like these, suggesting he wanted to seriously reform affirmative action, shifting it from a program that evaluated people based on race and instead evaluated people based upon income:
STEPHANOPOLOUS: Why should your daughters, when they go to college, get affirmative action?
OBAMA: Well, first of all, I think that my daughters should probably be treated by any admissions officer as folks who are pretty advantaged, and I think that there’s nothing wrong with us taking that into account as we consider admissions policies at universities. I think that we should take into account white kids who have been disadvantaged and have grown up in poverty and shown themselves to have what it takes to succeed.
The nuanced position on affirmative action was a pretty important point in establishing Obama as a Democrat who wasn’t a down-the-line liberal. The media largely concurred with his self-definition as a pragmatist or a centrist; after all, he had defied the liberal line with his criticism of the increasing national debt as “unpatriotic”, his declaration to Rick Warren that he believed marriage was “the union between a man and a woman,” and his insistence that “we’re going to have to take on entitlements, and we’re going to have to do it quickly.”
You see where I’m going with this.
Here we are, seven years later; Obama has been president for five of them. He’s run up record amounts of debt, he’s announced his support for gay marriage, and there’s no sign that any entitlement reform will be enacted during his presidency. And affirmative action remains the same as it was before, as the Obama administration argues existing programs should remain in place as they are.
All the intriguing anecdotes and thoughtful interview responses in the world don’t amount to a hill of beans compared to actual policy and decisions.
S.M. over at The Wilderness:
Barack Obama thinks his job is to lead the mob, not the country. When the mob dishes out justice, as they did with Brendan Eich, there’s nothing more for him to say.
Selfie!
Obama only speaks out when he sees something he disagrees with. That’s what progressive activists do. He doesn’t take to stage or podium and remind people of the protected First Amendment right of all Americans and that Eich’s contribution to political causes is important to the free political process of participation. As the Democrat Party binges on a Koch Brothers fueled narrative about millionaires owning elections with their wallets, they remained deftly silent about one private citizen, donating a mere one thousand dollars to the cause of his choice, a choice protected by the Constitution and upheld, repeatedly by the Supreme Court.
He adds, “Obama had absolutely nothing to do with Lois Lerner IRS targeting, which is why she talked about taking a job with his organization.”
We can scoff at Democrats, the media, and a few Republicans for so easily and credulously buying into the notion that a machine politician mentored by William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright would govern as some David-Gergen-esque centrist. (And we should! And we do!) But we on the right probably ought to remember this in a year or two, when a half-dozen or a dozen Republicans are going to tell us they’re the “real conservative” in the bunch. A lot of them will attempt to claim this mantle by running down the checklist of policy positions and declaring they agree with us on all or almost all of them.
That’s nice. But the promises and pledges might turn out to be the equivalent of Obama’s centrist stances and statements of 2007-2008. It’s much easier to forget a promise than to undo an action. To quote Congressman Bobby Rush, in a debate with then state legislator Barack Obama, when both men were competing for the Democratic primary for Rush’s seat in 2000, “Just what’s he done? I mean, what’s he done?””