[meadsjn]

The problem isn’t with these positions, it is that the liberal media try to use these position statements to portray them as backward freaks.

If someone went on the attack and didn’t apologize for their beliefs, they would get respect.

Pro-life candidates lose time after time because they try to appeal to the kinder, gentler side of monsters who have no kinder, gentler side.

Here's a winning pro-life campaign:

"If a woman wants an abortion, she can get an abortion.
When the baby is viable, we'll set up an appointment with a doctor who will either induce labor or remove the baby by C-section.
Then the doctor can abort the woman who wanted to kill her baby.

Horrible statement; horrible concept. But it will win. Solomon would approve.

If you want to keep losing, just keep turning the other cheek.

[Fai Mao]

“Horrible statement; horrible concept. But it will win. Solomon would approve.”

Here is a slightly more or less horrible one depending upon how you look at it. The purpose of this stance would be to show how evil the abortion industry is and how they will never except any compromise. (Note: I would be very uncomfortable with this policy even though i is a step in the right direction)

Here is the offer of a compromise that pro-aborts will refuse

1. A woman may have a single (ONE) abortion at any time up to delivery.

2.The abortion will be paid for by the state

3. The right to a single abortion is not transferable

4. The abortion must be done in a hospital not a clinic specific for that purpose.

5. If a woman seeks a second abortion she must agree to be permanently sterilized.

6. Let’s not be sexist about this either; any man who impregnates more than two women that he is not married to should be permanently sterilized. Yep, I mean a teenager how can’t keep it in his pants; red or yellow black or white they’re all philanderers in my sight. Spade and neuter them like stray cats

This would be a huge compromise for the pro-life movement in a lot of ways but the pro-killing-babies side would never go for it.

I many of the “soft” left voters might. The purpose of this stance would be to change the nature of the discussion away from the left’s talking points and to make them look like the radical murderers they are. This would also stop about 80% of all abortions