1 posted on
04/08/2014 10:39:45 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
P & S are just mad because the USSC just said it was legal to do what they are already doing,
and therefore, conservatives will be doing it too.
2 posted on
04/08/2014 10:40:44 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: jazusamo
They’re not working from that document, Betsy.
3 posted on
04/08/2014 10:43:22 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: jazusamo
Pelousey and Chuckles saying “read the Constitution”. BWAHAHAHAHA!
5 posted on
04/08/2014 10:55:35 AM PDT by
teletech
(Say NO to RINOS!)
To: jazusamo
Pelosi and Schumer are engaging in faux outrage. They have more billionaires than do the republicans, they have unions, they have Hollywood, they have investment houses, and they have the devil.
They just want to keep playing their stupid “republicans are the party of the rich” games.
It’s a pathetic farce to have to watch.
6 posted on
04/08/2014 10:57:20 AM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: jazusamo
Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the minority, disagreed, insisting that even though wealthy donors will have to spread their money around, they'll wield influence over politicians.Hey Steve-o: You think they don't already? WAKE-UP! There are roses that need to be smelled.
10 posted on
04/08/2014 11:17:06 AM PDT by
upchuck
(Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
To: jazusamo
Democrats don’t want a money war.
They want to go back to a time when the law let their union financial supporters legally donate more than non-union contributors.
15 posted on
04/08/2014 12:59:15 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(The future ain't what it use to be -- Yogi Berra)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson