Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vast oil trove trapped in Monterey Shale formation
Los AngelesTimes ^ | April 6, 2014 | Julie Cart

Posted on 04/08/2014 9:51:16 AM PDT by Praxeologue

SHAFTER, Calif. — A bustling city is sprouting on five acres here, carved out of a vast almond grove. Tanker trucks and heavy equipment come and go, a row of office trailers runs the length of the site and an imposing 150-foot drilling rig illuminated by football-field-like lights rises over the trees.

It's all been hustled into service to solve a tantalizing riddle: how to tap into the largest oil shale reservoir in the United States.

Across the southern San Joaquin Valley, oil exploration sites have popped up in agricultural fields and on government land, driven by the hope that technological advances in oil extraction — primarily hydraulic fracturing and acidization — can help provide access to deep and lucrative oil reserves.

The race began after the federal Energy Information Administration estimated in 2011 that more than 15 billion barrels of recoverable oil is trapped in what's known as the Monterey Shale formation, which covers 1,750 square miles, roughly from Bakersfield to Fresno.

But getting at that oil isn't easy. The Monterey Shale is unlike other oil shale formations across the United States. In those booming oil fields, reserves are pooled in orderly strata of rock. Once the rock is cracked open by fracking or other means, operators can sink a single well with multiple horizontal shafts and pull in oil from a wide area.

California's geology is far more complicated. The earth under the Monterey Shale has undergone constant seismic reshaping that has folded, stacked and fractured the substrate, trapping the oil in accordion pleats of hard rock at depths of up to 12,000 feet. To reach the crude using conventional methods requires oil companies to drill far-deeper wells, and more of them — a prohibitively expensive undertaking.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; energy; jerrybrown; monterey; montereyshale; oil; sanjoaquinvalley; shale; shaleoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Kennard; thackney

From the article:

“In the Monterrey formation, that expense might run to $5 million, and with every chance of yielding a dry hole.”
...............
I agree the geology is way complex and they have not yet cracked the code and they may never do so. But 5 million is on the low side for fracking wells. They’re glad to pay 5 million in the baaken and elsewhere.

Recently there are reports that the geologic code for the Tuscaloosa marine shale formation in Louisiana and Mississippi has been cracked. Current estimates are that that formation has 4 billion barrels of recoverable oil. (meaning that number is likely to go up as it closely track early estimates for baaken.) But they’re currently paying over 12 million for a well.


21 posted on 04/08/2014 10:36:46 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

well, we can hope...


22 posted on 04/08/2014 10:38:54 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

In the Monterrey formation, that expense might run to $5 million

- - - -

I would think that an average (or below average) price and not a maximum.


23 posted on 04/08/2014 10:40:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

The liberals are so foolish.

If only they would allow this oil to be extracted, they would have zillions more dollars to throw at their precious welfare programs and expensive boondoggles like the proposed high speed train linking LA to SF.


24 posted on 04/08/2014 10:42:25 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
And live within their means.

Well, THAT just blew away the rest of your post. These are 'unattended kids in a candy store' you're talking about here.

25 posted on 04/08/2014 10:54:00 AM PDT by houeto (Rand Paul, the NEW face of Establishment Republicanism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Just like Bigfoot and Alien abductions.

I bet you don't believe in man-made Global Warming either. You do know that deniers belong in prison, don't you?

26 posted on 04/08/2014 10:57:19 AM PDT by houeto (Rand Paul, the NEW face of Establishment Republicanism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ping.


27 posted on 04/08/2014 11:02:27 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Pong


28 posted on 04/08/2014 11:04:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The question is:
Will California lawmakers establish an environment that encourages the exploitation of this resource?


29 posted on 04/08/2014 11:07:50 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

They have figured out how many taxes they could collect from it, so it may be possible.

The Monterey Shale & California’s Economic Future
http://gen.usc.edu/assets/001/84955.pdf


30 posted on 04/08/2014 11:10:56 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Also, they have likely figured out some personal skims and kickbacks for themselves. These ARE Democrats, after all. ;-)


31 posted on 04/08/2014 11:15:55 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

“I drink your milkshake”.


32 posted on 04/08/2014 11:19:25 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

A Monterey-fueled oil shale industry could create 2.3 million new jobs by 2020 and boost the state’s GDP by as much as 14%.


Naw, let’s instead build a train to nowhere that cost $100 billion and going up. Plus free tuition for illegals andhigher taxes all around except them movie folks.


33 posted on 04/08/2014 11:25:28 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
In the Monterrey formation, that expense might run to $5 million, and with every chance of yielding a dry hole.

She lifted that from the anti-fracking articles that attempted to refute last year's USC study.

34 posted on 04/08/2014 11:33:11 AM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks Kennard.
'Monterey' Eric Burdon

Monterey Eric Burdon

35 posted on 04/08/2014 12:36:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

California Law to Regulate Fracking Signed by Governor
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3069432/posts

CA DEMOCRATS PASS PRO-FRACKING BILL
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3073965/posts

Will the Golden State Go Brown? The fracking revolution might finally be coming to California
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3034673/posts

California’s Brown hears fracking gripes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3131130/posts


36 posted on 04/08/2014 12:38:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
'Monterey' Eric Burdon

Maybe that's why no one has been able to crack the code on the Monterey.

They've had Eric Burdon doing the seismic analysis.

37 posted on 04/08/2014 1:02:20 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
I drink your milkshake

There are many parts of the world where the weather is better than California and no one will drink their milkshake. Their standard of living would be subsistence-level, however. If they want a decent material existence, they either need energy or they need money to pay for it. Otherwise, there will be blood.

38 posted on 04/08/2014 1:24:23 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

:’)


39 posted on 04/08/2014 2:10:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FINOs make me sick. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Or will be blamed for bringing on “ THE BIG ONE “ quake.


40 posted on 04/08/2014 2:36:54 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson