Posted on 04/08/2014 9:51:16 AM PDT by Praxeologue
From the article:
“In the Monterrey formation, that expense might run to $5 million, and with every chance of yielding a dry hole.”
...............
I agree the geology is way complex and they have not yet cracked the code and they may never do so. But 5 million is on the low side for fracking wells. They’re glad to pay 5 million in the baaken and elsewhere.
Recently there are reports that the geologic code for the Tuscaloosa marine shale formation in Louisiana and Mississippi has been cracked. Current estimates are that that formation has 4 billion barrels of recoverable oil. (meaning that number is likely to go up as it closely track early estimates for baaken.) But they’re currently paying over 12 million for a well.
well, we can hope...
In the Monterrey formation, that expense might run to $5 million
- - - -
I would think that an average (or below average) price and not a maximum.
The liberals are so foolish.
If only they would allow this oil to be extracted, they would have zillions more dollars to throw at their precious welfare programs and expensive boondoggles like the proposed high speed train linking LA to SF.
Well, THAT just blew away the rest of your post. These are 'unattended kids in a candy store' you're talking about here.
I bet you don't believe in man-made Global Warming either. You do know that deniers belong in prison, don't you?
Ping.
Pong
The question is:
Will California lawmakers establish an environment that encourages the exploitation of this resource?
They have figured out how many taxes they could collect from it, so it may be possible.
The Monterey Shale & Californias Economic Future
http://gen.usc.edu/assets/001/84955.pdf
Also, they have likely figured out some personal skims and kickbacks for themselves. These ARE Democrats, after all. ;-)
“I drink your milkshake”.
A Monterey-fueled oil shale industry could create 2.3 million new jobs by 2020 and boost the state’s GDP by as much as 14%.
Naw, let’s instead build a train to nowhere that cost $100 billion and going up. Plus free tuition for illegals andhigher taxes all around except them movie folks.
She lifted that from the anti-fracking articles that attempted to refute last year's USC study.
California Law to Regulate Fracking Signed by Governor
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3069432/posts
CA DEMOCRATS PASS PRO-FRACKING BILL
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3073965/posts
Will the Golden State Go Brown? The fracking revolution might finally be coming to California
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3034673/posts
Californias Brown hears fracking gripes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3131130/posts
Maybe that's why no one has been able to crack the code on the Monterey.
They've had Eric Burdon doing the seismic analysis.
There are many parts of the world where the weather is better than California and no one will drink their milkshake. Their standard of living would be subsistence-level, however. If they want a decent material existence, they either need energy or they need money to pay for it. Otherwise, there will be blood.
:’)
Or will be blamed for bringing on “ THE BIG ONE “ quake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.