Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy to test futuristic, super-fast gun at sea in 2016
Yahoo News ^ | 7 Apr 2014 | David Alexander

Posted on 04/07/2014 6:43:27 PM PDT by mandaladon

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy is planning sea trials for a weapon that can fire a low-cost, 23-pound (10-kg) projectile at seven times the speed of sound using electromagnetic energy, a "Star Wars" technology that will make enemies think twice, the Navy's research chief said.

Rear Admiral Matthew Klunder, the chief of Naval Research, told a round table group recently the futuristic electromagnetic rail gun had already undergone extensive testing on land and would be mounted on the USNS Millinocket, a high-speed vessel, for sea trials beginning in 2016.

"It's now reality and it's not science fiction. It's actually real. You can look at it. It's firing," said Klunder, who planned to discuss progress on the system later on Monday with military and industry leaders at a major maritime event - the Sea-Air-Space Exposition - near Washington.

"It will help us in air defense, it will help us in cruise missile defense, it will help us in ballistic missile defense," he said. "We're also talking about a gun that's going to shoot a projectile that's about one one-hundredth of the cost of an existing missile system today."

The Navy research chief said that cost differential - $25,000 for a railgun projectile versus $500,000 to $1.5 million for a missile - will make potential enemies think twice about the economic viability of engaging U.S. forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; navy; railgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: nomad

“Its coils and power generating systems would not be overloaded?”

No they wouldn’t and yes I am willing to bet...


41 posted on 04/07/2014 7:37:12 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
That's a totally electronic weapons system and only a certified retard would put all their eggs in one basket. Play with “toys” if you must, but stick to tested weapons when it counts.
42 posted on 04/07/2014 7:39:17 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nomad

So it is your assertion that the Navy plans to send these out in fleets of one,and that the rail gun would be the only armament?


43 posted on 04/07/2014 7:41:27 PM PDT by MrEdd (vHeck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

It seems to be a current fascination by many here, the latest toy to play with. Toys are fun, but defending the country is never a game. As I said, play with your toys if you must, but there has been enough “play time” in the last six years with our military. Keep the mainstays tried and true, and leave the playtime to that infantile ass in the whitehut.


44 posted on 04/07/2014 7:47:38 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
thor's hammer? ..early 60's Darpa research?

45 posted on 04/07/2014 7:50:10 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
slingshot around the moon?

46 posted on 04/07/2014 7:51:27 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nomad

New “toys” are how we keep an advantage.

We’d still be waging war with muskets if not for forward thinkers and their toys.


47 posted on 04/07/2014 7:53:26 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
"slingshot around the moon? "

They'll never see it coming. True "Rocket Science".

48 posted on 04/07/2014 7:53:46 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet
Don’t worry, Obama or Hagel will cancel it.

Bingo! Or an Obama-loyalist captain will "inadvertantly" sail into Chinese waters and allow the ship to get captured. The entire crew will be released unharmed, and the captain will get a Navy Cross from Soetoro for not provoking a war.

Five years later the Chinese will have 100 of them circling Taiwan.

49 posted on 04/07/2014 7:59:58 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Project Thor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment


50 posted on 04/07/2014 8:00:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nomad
What would happen to a rail-gun if a powerful EMP went off nearby?

I have to think that tactical EMP are long passed the drawing board.

51 posted on 04/07/2014 8:02:30 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nomad

Every new weapons development is deemed “a toy.”

This is the root of Germany capitalizing on Charles De Gaulle’s observations on mechanized warfare before the French and the allies, and behind the US disastrously delaying the addoption of Billy Mitchell’s air power docterines.

As the rest of the world dismissed the potential of a flotilla of small missile boats, Israel deployed the first such fleet in the Yom Kipper war.

Your knee jerk attitude is noted.

Adsolutely there are weapons developments which are lemons.
There are also game changers.


52 posted on 04/07/2014 8:02:51 PM PDT by MrEdd (vHeck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
Shouldn’t this be classified, at least Secret? Why is this Admiral talking about it?

Just trying to get the jump on Obama?

53 posted on 04/07/2014 8:07:15 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nomad

I’m noo expert by any means of course but with the advancement of ASBMs being what it is, it seems like energy weapons are the logical counter measure.


54 posted on 04/07/2014 8:16:06 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
"...a projectile that can go well into the atmosphere....Amazing stuff"

Perhaps, but an arrow from a longbow, a BB from a BB gun, a rock from a sling, etc, etc, all fire projectiles into the atmosphere.

Mr. Klunder might be a little more precise.

55 posted on 04/07/2014 8:16:55 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
thanks..that's what i remembered immediately.

56 posted on 04/07/2014 8:21:35 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"...USS Idaho suffered catastrophic gun damage, basically ending her career, when ammunition exploded."

Not sure what you are making a clear case of.

USS Idaho fought well in the Pacific, including at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, suffering little damage. Eventually decomissioned in '46.

57 posted on 04/07/2014 8:27:57 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Did you mean the USS Iowa?


58 posted on 04/07/2014 8:30:08 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
Please let these 67.7 million pages know that they are all spilling the beans about rail guns.
59 posted on 04/07/2014 8:32:39 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

The plans are already in the hands of the Chinese.


60 posted on 04/07/2014 8:35:01 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson