For guys, from teens to mid 20’s, you’re not noticed unless you are tall, handsome, and witty.
From mid 20’s to 40, you are finally noticed by women who spent their 20’s chasing the “hot” guys....
***
Really?
For women, from the teens to mid 20s, they are not noticed unless they are big busted and have long hair.
From mid 20s to 40, they are not noticed unless they are big busted and have long hair.
There are men on this site that go gaga over the blond bimbos on Fox, most of whom look as if someone stole the lower portion of their skirts. They even think Ann Coulter looks good just because she has long bleached blonde hair. IMO, she looks like a skinny man.
Just look, for instance, at all of the “not guilty’ comments that go around here. A good example of this ridiculous thinking is the photo someone posted here of Raquel Welch, who looks like she is in her 30s in the photo. The poster mentioned her age — I think it was 74.
Now does any sane person actually think that this woman just happens to look so good by just taking good care of herself through diet and exercise? Lord only knows how much work she’s had done. The bill for her beauty products is probably equal to the yearly income of a lot of people around here. But here she is held up as some ideal of beauty.
So please don’t talk as if it’s just women who are shallow.
I think it's more a case of women feel that they're not noticed by the guys they want, but the guys who WOULD want to date them are invisible to them.
I don't think the inverse is the case nearly as much with guys. The reason is because a guy is much more likely to date a less-than-ideal woman rather than be date-less, while a woman is more likely to stay home (or go out with the girls) rather than having her ego contemplate the possibility that a particular guy may be the best she can get.