Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpaceBar
excerpt from above link...

So what’s the answer? It appears this “gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back to Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5210.56, signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush.
20 posted on 04/04/2014 3:15:16 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SpaceBar
This piece from the Washington Times (a reputable source in my opinion) of November 11, 2009 squarely places the blame on Klansman Klintoon, the "man" who hated (and still hates) America and our military:

Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection. For the most part, only military police regularly carry firearms on base, and their presence is stretched thin by high demand for MPs in war zones.

Because of Clinton, terrorists would face more return fire if they attacked a Texas Wal-Mart than the gunman faced at Fort Hood, home of the heavily armed and feared 1st Cavalry Division. That’s why a civilian policewoman from off base was the one whose marksmanship ended Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s rampage.

23 posted on 04/04/2014 3:20:41 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson