I don’t understand her reasoning. Since everyone who watches or reads the news is going to know the name anyway, what is the point of her policy? It seems self-righteous and silly.
It is silly. By focusing on NOT telling us his name, she is only adding to and increasing our desire to know that info.
It’s a reverse psychology sort of thing.
Besides ... He is DEAD!
It won’t matter to him.
“I don’t understand her reasoning....”
******************************************************************
I do, and agree with it so long as it’s not terrorist related and is limited to not mentioning the shooter’s specific name.