LOL ... good one ... “National Enquirer”.
Do you have any “Flying Saucers landed on White House Lawn” ? ... :-) ...
I trust them more than the newspapers.
That’s the weekly world news!
National Enquirer has broken some heavy stuff before. Besides, these days the MSM is such a joke, it has the same level of reliability.
I’m not writing it off as impossible.
The National Enquirer has long been fairly accurate when it came to political shenanigans.
They are the ones that torpedoed John Edwards presidential aspirations.
They got to the bottom of the John Edwards scandal when no one else would touch it. Remember?
The National Enquirer: Journal of Record for the Clinton Administration.
No kidding. We need reliable, impartial sources like ABCNBCCBSCNN. They will give us the real scoop.
Shame everyone isn't as smart as you and me!
While most of what they publish is junk I wouldnt discredit them entirely....they did nail Edwards to a wall.
The Enquirer never really got into the off-the-wall stuff that Weekly World News did. WWN was deliberately nonsense. Enquirer on the other hand focused on actual events. Yes, a lot of what they wrote would never be confirmed, mostly because the MSM never covered those sorts of stories and the people themselves would deny everything, but TE did usually get things right. As others noted, the John Edwards story was a high point for them, and actually pushed them further towards legit coverage. They’re even more believable these days, due to a deliberate effort on their part, as a result of getting that one right.