[jpsb]

"He would do far better to advocate that the government should not be social engineering, which “gay marriage” is in spades."

Paul on same sex marriage

Gay marriage, for instance, is one issue on which Paul would like to shake up the Republican position. “I’m an old-fashioned traditionalist. I believe in the historic and religious definition of marriage,” he says. “That being said, I’m not for eliminating contracts between adults. I think there are ways to make the tax code more neutral, so it doesn’t mention marriage. Then we don’t have to redefine what marriage is; we just don’t have marriage in the tax code.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/342813/rand-paul-s-big-fight-robert-costa?pg=1

[HiTech RedNeck]

Something is going to have to cut the Gordian knot here. A government big enough to shove “gay marriage” down a whole state’s throat is just too “God-damned” big.

The demographic truth (as sad as it is) about America may make it wiser to refer to “households.” Even Pope Francis alluded to that, oddly enough.

And that would be fairer to a lot of people. What if two friends want to live chastely in a household?