PA:Robbers Killed by an Armed Citizen, Now The Families Want To Sue

usconcealedcarry.com ^ | 24 March, 2014 | Kevin Michalowski

[marktwain]

Sad but true, this is the way it works in the United States. Two men entered a convenience store, pointed their guns at the clerk, and robbed the store. As they exited the store, an armed citizen confronted them. The robbers pointed their guns at the honest citizen and he shot and killed both of them.

Now the family of one of the dead robbers wants “justice.” They want to sue the honest citizen. And leave it to the media to give the families of armed robbers a forum.

In what has become a cliché, the mother of an armed robber takes to the airwaves to say, “He was a good boy.” This family then has the nerve to say the robbers didn’t deserve to be shot; that an honest citizen had no right to fire at two “boys” who pointed their guns at him. The family then goes on to say that while their boy was a known drug user, he likely only robbed the store so he could get money to pay his child support. It is a seven-minute video, but it should make your blood boil:

And Now They Want to Sue…

[EDINVA]

If you want your lawsuit, you can keep your lawsuit. Period!

[EDINVA]

As I understand it from a woman who lives in that community, at tax time the mothers “sell” the kids’ IDs to those who DO pay taxes. IIRC, they get @ $500 cash for each kid’s ID. Their favorite time of year. Think about those “mothers” who have 5,6,7 kids (before their 30th birthday).

[mlo]

Watched it now. The reporter said that’s what the DA said. I’m betting it’s the reporter that mixed up different parts of a conversation.

[Hot Tabasco]

The lawsuit is not allowed under Pennsylvania law.

As long as there are laws, there's attorneys willing to jump on the ambulance.........

[inpajamas]

And in November the two robbers will show up to vote for the first time.

[NorthMountain]

Interesting ... I guess that explains the specific Self Defense policies.

[petercooper]

EITC- yes I forgot. Thanks