Full title: Why a Middle School Was Ordered to Tear Down Its Brand-New Baseball Bleachers Will Likely Have Small-Govt Advocates Shaking Their Heads
1 posted on
03/28/2014 12:02:05 PM PDT by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: lowbridge
The government hates boys.
36 posted on
03/28/2014 12:18:48 PM PDT by
pbear8
(the Lord is my light and my salvation)
To: lowbridge
Pure insanity. They should rebuild it on private property! And reap concession sales
38 posted on
03/28/2014 12:20:03 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: lowbridge
I’d like to meet whoever it was that issued the original complaint. Once someone complains, obviously our stupid government is going to swoop to the rescue. I want to know who picked up the phone and vomited into the mouthpiece.
39 posted on
03/28/2014 12:20:45 PM PDT by
TheZMan
(Buy more ammo.)
To: lowbridge
43 posted on
03/28/2014 12:24:15 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I support Joe Carr in the TN GOP Primary against Lamar!)
To: lowbridge
Parents need to sue the government under the takings clause.
To: lowbridge
46 posted on
03/28/2014 12:25:53 PM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: lowbridge
The school agreed to tear down the new bleachers after government officials issued a citation. That was their first mistake.
47 posted on
03/28/2014 12:26:22 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: lowbridge
If a high level bureaucrat disappeared every time there is an idiotic event like this, maybe they would start to think twice about their gross over-reach and subjugation of a once free people. Just sayin’.
49 posted on
03/28/2014 12:28:00 PM PDT by
USMA '71
((Re-elect no one!))
To: lowbridge
Is it still too soon to shoot the bastards?
To: lowbridge
So if they moved the girls to the boys field, and the boys to the girls field, would they still have to tear it down?
54 posted on
03/28/2014 12:34:30 PM PDT by
Stosh
To: lowbridge
If it was paid for by private funds, why is it anybody in the government’s business?.........................
57 posted on
03/28/2014 12:38:40 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
To: lowbridge
Visualize waking up tomorrow and learning that overnight, D.C. had been mysteriously converted to a field of daisies. Buildings gone, people gone. Gone like it was never there. Would the public be overall in better hands with a field of daisies? I’m beginning to think so. The daisies would not nag, they would not spy, tax, dictate, bother, threaten, harass, or lie. The daisies would just sit their, looking kind of pretty. It’s a nice dream.
70 posted on
03/28/2014 12:58:28 PM PDT by
Flick Lives
("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
To: lowbridge
Another reason to NEVER vote DemocRAT AGAIN!!!
71 posted on
03/28/2014 12:59:25 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: lowbridge
Title VII.
There's the problem right there.
73 posted on
03/28/2014 1:00:45 PM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: lowbridge
“...and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” - DOI, 1776
To: lowbridge
The proper response for this and many other Federal orders is to say NO!
88 posted on
03/28/2014 2:15:57 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: lowbridge
And if some dads had gotten together and built something nice for their daughters, I'm sure it would have been ripped right down too.
Right?
Right?
89 posted on
03/28/2014 2:16:45 PM PDT by
sphinx
To: lowbridge
In the age where a leftist like Obama can be elected president, these kind of actions will be the normal in the not-too-distant future. That’s the way leftists think.
To: lowbridge
You see “equal ‘opportunity’ “ is NOT about equal “opportunity”. It is instead about equal “result” and if boys and girls do not chose to participate in “school, team sports” equally, and parents do not voluntarily contribute to such involvement “equally”, then that constitutes “disparate impact” (result) and while it may confirm and conform with people’s choices it does not conform to government mandated and artificially “equal” participation.
99 posted on
03/28/2014 5:42:50 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: lowbridge
Thanks for alerting us to this specific example of Obama’s idiocy.
101 posted on
03/28/2014 6:24:49 PM PDT by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson