Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zman516

It may be ... simply ... the hospitals looking out for their own well being. And from their own standpoint, it does make a lot of sense. From the consumer standpoint, I just don’t know.


11 posted on 03/27/2014 10:31:21 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
From the consumer standpoint...

Liberty and the free market is the way to go.

Insurance companies would wind up offering popular catastrophic insurance for peanuts. Consumers would pay much less because insurance/government/most-bureaucracy would be cut out of the equation. With some tort reform, costs would plummet even further.

Case in point: Doctor's today that have opted out of dealing with any insurance company.

16 posted on 03/27/2014 10:37:20 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler
from the consumer standpoint

There was a TV news segment in these parts a few months back about turning annual medical checkups into small-group sessions for people with the same general health situations. It seemed like a possibly good innovation.

I'm all for clinic-style health care. If the hospitals took over insurance and offered a walk-in first come first served clinic option to their enrollees, that would be a step in a good direction.

For one year in the late 1960s, I was just making ends meet and depended on clinic-style medicine at hospital-run facility. It's the best medical care I ever had.

26 posted on 03/27/2014 10:44:23 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson