[Secret Agent Man]

well then putmup a sign and encourage all the violent, released folks to arm up and gun you down. that will really put the pin in your argument.

it is clear that folks who have demonstrated they will abuse their 2a rights, by doing so committing violent acts - armed burglary, armed robbery, felony assault, felony battery, attempted murder, murder,

ought not be allowed them again. as long as they could be let back out into society. i’m not talking about the guy who walks into a store and doesn’t see a sign, or even on school grounds, or has a bullet in his pocket somewhere,’or a guy travelling between states while armed, or any stupid little procedural thing where she’s not hurting anyone. or even for crimes that may be technically felonies but aren’t violent ones.

it has nothing to do with buying into anything liberal. it has everything to do with narrowing the scope to only people who commit violent crimes with guns. he ones who’ve proven they will abuse that right. i am against zero-tolerance logic and you position is more liberal zero-tolerance, non-thinking, than mine.

when these people’commit crimes again with guns and’murder’people the blood will be on your hands and you will have to answer their loved’ones asto why it wasn’t common sense not to allow guns back i to these criminals’ hands again. the blood will be on you. but you’ll have your precious zero-tolerance non-think re-arm the violent felons that get out of jail law.

[andyk]

it has nothing to do with buying into anything liberal. it has everything to do with narrowing the scope to only people who commit violent crimes with guns. he ones who’ve proven they will abuse that right. i am against zero-tolerance logic and you position is more liberal zero-tolerance, non-thinking, than mine.

I just think that people who are determined to commit crimes are not going to be deterred by background checks. Only the little people. I think free men should not be prevented from protecting themselves. You disagree - you just don't want to say it in so many words.

when these people’commit crimes again with guns and’murder’people the blood will be on your hands and you will have to answer their loved’ones asto why it wasn’t common sense not to allow guns back i to these criminals’ hands again.

Your argument holds water if you currently answer to loved ones who are mourning victims who were killed by criminals constrained by your current system.

But seriously, you said my argument was liberal. This argument above is the epitome of a liberal, emotional argument.