Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
it has nothing to do with buying into anything liberal. it has everything to do with narrowing the scope to only people who commit violent crimes with guns. he ones who’ve proven they will abuse that right. i am against zero-tolerance logic and you position is more liberal zero-tolerance, non-thinking, than mine.

I just think that people who are determined to commit crimes are not going to be deterred by background checks. Only the little people. I think free men should not be prevented from protecting themselves. You disagree - you just don't want to say it in so many words.

when these people’commit crimes again with guns and’murder’people the blood will be on your hands and you will have to answer their loved’ones asto why it wasn’t common sense not to allow guns back i to these criminals’ hands again.

Your argument holds water if you currently answer to loved ones who are mourning victims who were killed by criminals constrained by your current system.

But seriously, you said my argument was liberal. This argument above is the epitome of a liberal, emotional argument.
32 posted on 03/26/2014 5:45:48 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: andyk

we agree to disagree. move on.


33 posted on 03/26/2014 6:20:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson