To: Secret Agent Man
it has nothing to do with buying into anything liberal. it has everything to do with narrowing the scope to only people who commit violent crimes with guns. he ones whove proven they will abuse that right. i am against zero-tolerance logic and you position is more liberal zero-tolerance, non-thinking, than mine.
I just think that people who are determined to commit crimes are not going to be deterred by background checks. Only the little people. I think free men should not be prevented from protecting themselves. You disagree - you just don't want to say it in so many words.
when these peoplecommit crimes again with guns andmurderpeople the blood will be on your hands and you will have to answer their lovedones asto why it wasnt common sense not to allow guns back i to these criminals hands again.
Your argument holds water if you currently answer to loved ones who are mourning victims who were killed by criminals constrained by your current system.
But seriously, you said my argument was liberal. This argument above is the epitome of a liberal, emotional argument.
32 posted on
03/26/2014 5:45:48 PM PDT by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: andyk
we agree to disagree. move on.
33 posted on
03/26/2014 6:20:20 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson