About time!
1 posted on
03/24/2014 4:57:32 PM PDT by
QT3.14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: QT3.14
Take that, US enviroweenies.
2 posted on
03/24/2014 4:58:37 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: QT3.14
This was obvious from the start.
3 posted on
03/24/2014 5:00:58 PM PDT by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: QT3.14
Wow, I actually agree with the UN on something!
4 posted on
03/24/2014 5:01:18 PM PDT by
TBall
To: QT3.14
Actually, I think this reeks of oil company pr efforts. The UN is a wholly owned subsidiary of the 1% just as the US congress is.
5 posted on
03/24/2014 5:02:53 PM PDT by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: QT3.14
This will prompt serious strife among the greenies. What to do? What to do?
To: QT3.14
Iowa is the 1st primary state. If a candidate loses badly there, it’s an uphill challenge.
My guess is they will have all the presidential candidates lined up to stand behind their corn subsidies.
7 posted on
03/24/2014 5:03:14 PM PDT by
boycott
To: QT3.14
The best biofuel is made from algae. It not only consumes carbon and nitrous oxides, but then is a pretty easy to process into biodiesel. First squeeze out the oil, then mix it with ethanol in the presence of a lye catalyst. Filter, then add 1% petroleum diesel as a preservative.
To: QT3.14
This is really maddening. My local farmer says that the corn farmers make out as they play the market, too.
I didn't even buy corn on the cob this year. And I can hardly remember the last time I had a good steak.
To: QT3.14
When are people going to realize that environmentalists do not care about the environment. They care about how being an environmentalist makes them feel and how it can be used to further the socialist agenda.
11 posted on
03/24/2014 5:19:23 PM PDT by
rey
To: QT3.14
OMG! I was just hit by a flying pig!
To: QT3.14
The most efficient way to use bio fuels is to burn it in a power generating plant.
Any kind of processing it into another kind of fuel will take more energy than it's worth.
Algae, grass, inedible and junk plants and most of all WOOD are excellent renewable resources to boot.
But anything good enough to be economically feasible, the greens will find some reason to be against it anyway.
15 posted on
03/24/2014 5:32:32 PM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: QT3.14
17 posted on
03/24/2014 5:35:43 PM PDT by
Rodamala
To: QT3.14
No! Really? Are you kidding? Burning food is not a good idea for saving the environment? Who would have guessed? Besides everybody with functioning intellect above IQ 45, who else? You mean MENSA didn't have this one whipped years ago.? Huh. Goes to show you that given enough time the obvious becomes, well, obvious. Now will they be able to make the radical leap that India and China combined far outstrips the meager pollution this country may produce.
18 posted on
03/24/2014 5:36:31 PM PDT by
cashless
(Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
To: QT3.14
20 posted on
03/24/2014 5:47:02 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
To: QT3.14
Duh! Takes tax subsidies and government edicts to keep this do gooder hoax jammed down our throats. Vote it out of existence.
21 posted on
03/24/2014 5:49:09 PM PDT by
Recompennation
(Constitutional protection for all not ju st selectively for Democrats.)
To: QT3.14
I have been opposed to ethanol from the start. I just don’t like the idea of having the production of fuel compete with the production of bourbon.
22 posted on
03/24/2014 5:51:01 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
To: QT3.14
Bought and paid for by Oil Industry worldwide
***
Nobody has yet to die for a gallon of ethanol...
***
23 posted on
03/24/2014 5:55:28 PM PDT by
sbark
To: QT3.14
Of course it’s a bad idea, but the market should decide that, not the UN.
26 posted on
03/24/2014 6:04:49 PM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: QT3.14
Well, the UN says it so it has to be true.
Death to bio-fuel promoters!!! Earf destroyers must die.
;^)
29 posted on
03/24/2014 6:32:15 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: QT3.14
No S*_¥ Sherlock
That’s been the aurgument about ethanol bio-crap from the start!
Oh wait, is this satire?!/S
30 posted on
03/24/2014 7:00:34 PM PDT by
9422WMR
(: " Tolerance is the virtue of a man who has no convictions".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
