Patently illegal. They can ban shooting but not ownership. Ignore.
Let’s see these Nazi’s enforce the ban! Not possible.
“Patently illegal. They can ban shooting but not ownership. Ignore.”
This will not stop them from taking you to court and it costs $5000 down and $500 an hour to operate the legal system. Almost nobody can afford it. Also, they can place a lien on your property. Is any of this legal? Probably no. But, it costs dearly to undo their actions and you’re unlikely to recover the money you spend and they can keep taking those actions until you’re broke. HOA’s are where you find your inner Nazi.
Residents in Nashboro Village said it's unconstitutional and leaves them defenseless.
Not really. This company manages the property and what they are dealing with is a contract. Contracts between willing partners can restrict rights that governments can not.
These people signed a contract giving this company wide latitude to create rules for the community.
This is a perfect illustration of why it is important to read the contract before you sign and go to the meetings when the association council is meeting to make rules. Also know who you are voting for when the association has elections.
Officials with Ghertner and Company, the property manager at Nashboro Village, would not make an on-camera comment about the gun policy but said they plan on changing the rule soon to allow firearms on the property.
However, they would make it illegal to fire those guns, which residents say is still unconstitutional.
I understand this no firing guns rules. Bullets easily pass through most walls and kill people next door. This simple CYA for the HOA.
Patently illegal. They can ban shooting but not ownership. Ignore.
Same thing here.