Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia’s Shifting of Border Force Stirs U.S. Worry
NYT ^ | March 21, 2014 | By Mark Landler

Posted on 03/22/2014 10:04:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

WASHINGTON — The White House cast doubt Friday on the Kremlin’s claims that thousands of troops massing on the border of southeastern Ukraine are merely involved in training exercises, deepening fears that Russian aggression will not end in Crimea.

“It’s not clear what that signals,” the national security adviser, Susan E. Rice, said to reporters in a briefing at the White House. But she added, “Obviously given their past practice and the gap between what they have said and what they have done, we are watching it with skepticism.”

At the Pentagon, senior officers and analysts said they were monitoring the Russian infantry, airborne, air defense and other reinforcements with growing alarm, uncertain of President Vladimir V. Putin’s ambitions.

Pentagon officials do not believe that a new Russian move into Ukraine is imminent. But one of their big worries is that American and NATO officials would have virtually no time to react if it did happen. All told, officials said, there are more than 20,000 troops near the border.

“The Russian forces are reinforcing and bulking up along the eastern Ukrainian border,” a Pentagon official said. “Our view is they’re preserving all their options, including going in, absolutely. If they choose to do that, we just wouldn’t have much warning.”

President Obama cited the troop movements on Thursday in announcing new sanctions...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: crimea; obama; putin; russia; ukraine; viktoryanukovich; yuliatymoshenko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: JimSEA
there was already a directive signed by putin to study a tunnel/bridge from crimea to russia. only 2.5 miles. it would be designed to carry both rail and road traffic

estimated cost is $1 billion so far

21 posted on 03/22/2014 11:03:50 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
we are watching it with skepticism

She is selling herself short; she should also say she's watching it with hand-wringing, just like Carter!

22 posted on 03/22/2014 12:45:29 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
estimated cost is $1 billion so far

Hmmm... sounds like a real bargain. They must not have unions and county commissioners to pay off.

23 posted on 03/22/2014 12:47:37 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There is now no area of Ukraine that is majority ethnic Russian. Putin is going to be party to ethnic cleansing?


24 posted on 03/22/2014 2:27:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/03/22/crimea-has-joined-the-ranks-of-the-worlds-gray-areas-here-are-the-others-on-that-list/


25 posted on 03/22/2014 4:08:33 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moorings
The Ukes better prepare hard for guerrilla warfare. They are not strong enough for a direct faceoff, and they should not expect substantial help from the West.

Let the Ruskies come in, then go after them all over the place. Vlad needs to pay a heavy price.


It's sad we can't do much, I know we cannot take on the Russians in their backyard, it could start WWIII but at least we can support the Ukraines morally and if we can slip them supplies somehow. I work in a department store and I see many customers from Eastern Europe, the Ukraine mostly and they are scared and upset. I told them I am in step with them where I think the Russians are wrong and if I can magically transport things, I'd send over 1 million M1 Garands and Carbines, 50,000 bazookas and 5000 Sherman tanks (and supplies) to fend off the Russians when the time comes. They said to me that they wish that I could.

It was a mistake of them to give up their nukes and rely on others for their protection. There could be a time when your friends, even if they support you in many others ways, if they cannot defend you, you're screwed. I think lastly, if I wanted to be a real thorn in Russia's side, I'd plant dynamite all over the casket at Chernobyl if safe enough or otherwise be able to blow it from a distance when the wind is right and let the fallout fly over Russia.
26 posted on 03/22/2014 5:11:34 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-193 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: palmer
The other side in this conflict is the socialists in Brussels and their allies in Ukraine who want Ukraine (and Crimea) to have the same "human rights" as the rest of Europe like the "right" to commit suicide and have your organs harvested, and the "right" to have free housing and healthcare.

And the right of faggots to undermine all vestiges of Judeo-Christian culture.

27 posted on 03/22/2014 5:15:43 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
Greatest threat to Ukraine is its economy. They indebted 9 billions $$ to Russian banks, 1.8 bln $$ to Gasprom, 140 bln $$ to Western financial institutes. Without 40 bln financial help in current year they will have very serious problems. Protests in Kiev were caused by dissatisfaction with low living standards and corrupt oligarchic government. Now all social expenditures will be shortened drastically, taxes will be greater as main conditions to acquire IMF loans. Current government is no less oligarchic than previous while all governmental structures are in disorder. I wonder who is ready to invest is such basket case. Not big asset to wage war for. May be China only has enough money to save failed state with 45 mln populace.
28 posted on 03/22/2014 6:21:15 PM PDT by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cossak
y. They indebted 9 billions $$ to Russian banks, 1.8 bln $$ to Gasprom, 140 bln $$ to Western financial institutes.

So what happens if Russia offers to forgive the debt in exchange for Ukraine going into the Russian fold?

29 posted on 03/22/2014 6:22:23 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

Exercises must resemble possible reality. In Central Siberia Russia has no threats.


30 posted on 03/22/2014 6:28:34 PM PDT by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
"but at least we can support the Ukraines morally"

"first of all, we have to support the Ukrainian nationalist neo-nazis and their leader Oleg T." - SS of State Nuland and John Calamity McCain


31 posted on 03/22/2014 6:41:01 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I'm very good, but when I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“Stirs U.S. worry”.. What kind of emasculated, pansy-arsed language is that? I guess we are second fiddle to #1 superpower Russia now. Thanks, ladies, and the boy raised by a single feminist mommy and a cross-dressing transgender nanny.


32 posted on 03/22/2014 7:25:44 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
It will drown Russian economy for Ukraine is too big, with all accumulated economic and social problems. 23+ years of anti-Russian propaganda, glorifying Galitsia SSmen in Ukraine created general negative attitude in Russians to Ukraine. May be industrial Russian speaking South East. For Russia it would be much better to have Ukraine independent and not hostile. But it is hardly possible. This state appeared artificially 100 years ago by whim of bigger players; it never was independent and is nonviable on its own.
33 posted on 03/22/2014 8:45:07 PM PDT by Cossak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Man, Johnny sure can pick ‘em.


34 posted on 03/22/2014 8:52:57 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

The point is the Russians invaded a sovereign country and are being bullies. I do not support neo-Nazis at all and I support a more responsible leadership than that.


35 posted on 03/22/2014 10:36:29 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-193 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cossak

“This state appeared artificially 100 years ago by whim of bigger players; it never was independent and is nonviable on its own.”

See my post http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3136137/posts?page=94#94


36 posted on 03/23/2014 2:20:43 AM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I'm very good, but when I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cossak
Good post.

Ukraine is unable to pay Russia back in cash and is an economic basket case.

There is no money to field an effective defense.

For the next three years Putin will foreclose and repossess the parts of the Ukraine he wants. Obama will continue to show the flexibility he promised.

37 posted on 03/23/2014 7:46:19 AM PDT by Gabrial (The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
I think it means Obama will roll over painfully in bed with a hangover after a heavy night of drinking, smoking, snorting, and cavorting with Reggie - vaguely trying to remember there is something happening he should be concerned about.
38 posted on 03/23/2014 7:52:03 AM PDT by Gabrial (The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

Right. Cause massive casualties to themselves since the Ukrainian people are divided themselves and have few weapons and no right to bear arms.


39 posted on 03/23/2014 7:56:34 AM PDT by bill1952 (taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson