[USCG SimTech]

So will this distinguished panel engage in REAL science and ensure:

1. Where are the scientific equipment calibration certification documents for each and every sensor used to derive said numbers over the time span of the collection sampling?

2. Are all the calibration certifications verifiable and not possible to be altered by any source once the certifications are sealed?

3. For the data from these calibrated sensors, demonstrate the chain of custody that is unalterable from the sensor, its time and date, to the output final documents (charts, graphs, tables). The data must be verifiable as unchanged, accurate and true by any and all that investigate the data. This includes surprise inspections.

If workers are required to work under these condition inside a nuke plant (and they are) why should data that supposedly affects the entire Earth in one way or another not be held to the same scrutiny?

[Black Agnes]

You’ve described my exact issues with the whole scam. The devil is in the data. And zealots are in charge of the collection, maintenance and distribution of the data.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

The answer to questions 1,2, and 3: There are millions of very accurate climate sensors around the globe, their data can be easily verified, going back centuries, even thousands of years.

They are called "trees".