Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy
The intent wasn't that the Senate do the will of the people per se, they were there to safeguard States' Rights. The House of Representatives was supposed to safeguard the People and invoke their will, which is why all revenue measures are requried to originate in the House.

As a spinoff, people would continue to be involved in their State level politics, when currently I doubt one person in 10 could tell you who their State (not Federal) Senator or Representative is.

But what was supposed to be a bottom up government has become very much top down, the power in this country was first and foremost supposed to be in the hands of the People. Idiots electing politicians isn't working out so well, either.

70 posted on 03/22/2014 12:35:37 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

The much much more important distinction between the Senate and House than the manner of election was that each state has the same number of Senators regardless of population.

The people of each state are “the state” as much as the state government they elect. No need for a middle man unless you think the career politicians that run state legislatures are our betters.

Anyway, the most important point his that this scheme is a fantasy with zero chance of ever happening and if our side actually made it a major campaign issue it would be extremely unpopular wedge issue.


72 posted on 03/22/2014 6:50:36 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson