Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who wants to ban Internet gaming? (GOP Nannies strike again)
Daily Caller ^ | March 19, 2014 | Matt K. Lewis

Posted on 03/20/2014 7:42:20 AM PDT by C19fan

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that “Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz is preparing to introduce a bill that would restore the pre-2011 federal ban on Internet gaming, a spokeswoman confirmed on Wednesday. It would join a similar bill to be sponsored in the Senate by GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.”

“The goals of the Graham-Chaffetz legislation,” the Review-Journal continues, “are consistent with the highly publicized campaign by billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson to outlaw Internet gambling on moral grounds.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: internetgaming; nanny; online; onlinepoker; poker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
I really hate these GOP Nanny staters. It was their ilk like Frist and Leach who banned online poker during the Bush the Younger administration. Luv the modern day version of the "Bootleggers and Baptists" alliance in this case brick and mortar casino owners and so called SoCons whether real ones like Chaffetz or fake ones running for re-election like Graham. How about letting me spend my money the way I want to.
1 posted on 03/20/2014 7:42:20 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yep. And besides, what is the Biblical basis for gambling being bad to begin with, besides the stewardship reference? It takes a broad interpretation to single out gambling alone as poor stewardship.


2 posted on 03/20/2014 7:47:02 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“How about letting me spend my money the way I want to.”

Yeah like on drugs and prostitutes.


3 posted on 03/20/2014 7:48:24 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Yeah like on drugs and prostitutes.

Exactly!

4 posted on 03/20/2014 7:51:04 AM PDT by eclecticEel ("The petty man forsakes what lies within his power and longs for what lies with Heaven." - Xunzi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This shit cost us a lot of votes in 2006.


5 posted on 03/20/2014 7:57:02 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

They’re just doing the bidding of the brick-and-mortar casino owners. If gambling is “bad” and should be outlawed, then it should be outlawed everywhere.


6 posted on 03/20/2014 7:59:05 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Gambling is evil........unless you go to a casino,play the govermnent lottery, or get drunk at a bar and play Keno.


7 posted on 03/20/2014 8:01:49 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Exactly. Harry Reid didn’t get his position based on his warm and sunny personality.


8 posted on 03/20/2014 8:03:44 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

He sounds like he is stuck on stupid or a democrat plant.


9 posted on 03/20/2014 8:06:17 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

They’re only protecting their contribution pipeline. Online gaming is mostly overseas and contributions from overseas donors if I recall is illegal.


10 posted on 03/20/2014 8:07:21 AM PDT by CARTOUCHE (I will not comply !!!! No gov't care for me! No oversight, no insight, no meal site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
In NY state they have this stupid commercial where some young school girl sings (terribly, I might add) "thank you for being a friend" after somebody in a bodega buys a scratch-off or NY lottery ticket. It states that "everybody wins" when you play the NY lottery because it pays for education. Yet taxes still go up for education costs in the state and city.

I don't trust online gaming and I don't trust the government. Most people can gamble within reason but many cannot and get addicted. Is that a good enough reason to restrict it? I don't think so but each state should have the right to answer this question and not the Fed Gov.

As for the votes this cost in 2006 I think many conservatives were looking for any reason to stay home because they were sick with what they voted in to office previously.

11 posted on 03/20/2014 8:21:34 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CARTOUCHE

NJ now has legal online gaming. But you have to reside in the State of NJ.
I don’t trust online gaming. I can usually be found at the craps table if gambling. I gotta feel them bones in my hand.


12 posted on 03/20/2014 8:29:45 AM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Funny how they needed to Amend the Constitution to outlaw alcohol but now they can ban any damn thing they want if they can just scrape together a majority vote.

Drugs, prostitution, gambling, alcohol, even incandescent light bulbs — I don’t see ANY of those listed in Article I, Section 8.

Those are state decisions, not federal ones!


13 posted on 03/20/2014 8:30:46 AM PDT by DNME (This is the government our Founders warned us about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocJhn

10-4


14 posted on 03/20/2014 8:31:45 AM PDT by CARTOUCHE (I will not comply !!!! No gov't care for me! No oversight, no insight, no meal site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Let’s see now...

YOU are “playing poker” on the internet
with a faceless computer that:
(1) sees the cards it has,
(2) sees the cards YOU have,
(3) sees all the cards in the “deck” and
(4) can “deal” itself any card it needs to “win”.

WHAT could “go wrong”?


15 posted on 03/20/2014 8:39:04 AM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pfony1

Other than you analogy! Your playing against other people, they can’t see your card’s, can’t see the deck and they don’t deal. When Pokerstars was shut down I was up a little over 8,000.00 dollars for that year. I strictly played sit and goes where your playing against 9 to 18 individuals.


16 posted on 03/20/2014 8:52:13 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Bootleggers and Baptists” alliance is nothing new. When I attended Miss. State Uni. the county allowed the sale of liquor but not beer. The beer joints, owned by local merchants, could be found 12 miles away in another county. And every time the beer referendum came up it would be fought by the town church leaders with money supplied by these same merchants. Doing God’s work while keeping the juke-joints open. Amen...


17 posted on 03/20/2014 9:13:11 AM PDT by Exeter (A government that doesn't trust its people is a government that shouldn't be trusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Sheldon Adelson to outlaw Internet gambling on moral grounds

OK, this is laughable, but Adelson is one of the few whales on our side.

He gave millions to Gingrich, for example to defeat Romney.

Let's not piss him off.

18 posted on 03/20/2014 9:25:49 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNME

The 10th amendment does not say that any federal power not given to the Fed is then given to the states.


19 posted on 03/20/2014 10:38:55 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CARTOUCHE

“Online gaming is mostly overseas....”

I wonder why that is? It couldn’t have something to do with the fact that the Justice Department chased the American companies out and still has warrants out on the owners, could it?


20 posted on 03/20/2014 11:26:43 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson