Posted on 03/19/2014 8:05:51 PM PDT by Nachum
Rand Paul wowing them at Berkeley
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
He should run on the democrat ticket. After all, he is moving in that direction.
He should run on the democrat ticket. After all, he is moving in that direction.
BS. He’s very conservative. Some don’t really understand conservatism.
And I believe he has the best chance to win.
No he is not moving in the Dem direction, not at all. He is advocating freedom which neither the dems or the pubbies have high on their agenda.
Seriously, I don't think he is. He is Libertarian to a fault. He is an Isolationist. He is a lessez faire capitalist. Those positions are a far cry from the Neo-Socialism espoused by the Democrats.
I think he would necessarily be different on Religion, Abortion, and Marriage because Libertarians just don't seem to care. Also, he is a strict constitutionalist. -At least as far as I can tell.
Was that a rainbow belt he was wearing at Berkely?
There’s good Dominoes?
Moving in that direction? Really? No, that would be the GOP you’re thinking of.
Yep! While I don't agree with everything Rand Paul has to say, I find it refreshing that young people are applauding him and not, say, Chelsea Clinton. There might be some hope for the country yet.
Silly me, I didn't know amnesty for illegals was "conservative". Can you pass me some of your Rand Kool Aid?
Conservative is getting Chinless reelected to keep the Senate liberal in case the Republicans ever win it. Got it.
Used to be. Back when you could only get it in Michigan.
Redundant phrase of the year.
He’s none of that, he’s a “Player.” He does what he has to to forward his career. He doesn’t really have principles to anchor him. 35 years from now he’s McCain.
Heard that about McCain and McRomney.
Amnesty, boosting McConnell in a key primary election, telling social conservatives to shut up and sit down. Yes, he is very conservative.
1. He’s for amnesty.
2. He’s for going softer on “social issues” (while we have a >40% illegitimacy rate, homosexual marriage and mass child killing).
3. He’s now sounding like a foreign interventionist (no thanks!)
He’s crossed himself off my list.
He is going to win all the independents, moderates, and some democrats and cruise to a landslide victory, just like we did in 2012.
I am 100% pro-life. I believe life begins at conception and that abortion takes the life of an innocent human being. It is the duty of our government to protect this life as a right guaranteed under the Constitution. For this reason, I introduced S. 583, the Life at Conception Act on March 14, 2013. This bill would extend the Constitutional protection of life to the unborn from the time of conception.
but then he says
Republicans should “agree to disagree” about social issues, including abortion.
Color me confused.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.