Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Republicans Need to Soften on Social Issues
Breitbart ^ | 3-16-2014 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 03/15/2014 12:24:23 PM PDT by TitansAFC

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is warning Republicans that if they expect to be relevant in the future and grow the party they will have to soften on social issues.

In an interview with vocativ.com, Paul said he had "sort of a Jeffersonian belief in unity, peace and commerce with all" and that the best way to build the GOP for the future is to include people with whom they don't agree on every issue.

"I think that the Republican Party, in order to get bigger, will have to agree to disagree on social issues," Paul advised. "The Republican Party is not going to give up on having quite a few people who do believe in traditional marriage. But the Republican Party also has to find a place for young people and others who don’t want to be festooned by those issues......"

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 113th; 2014issues; 2014midterms; 2016; abortion; ajoke; libertarians; loser; notaleader; notconservative; notteaparty; paul; paul2016; randpaul; randpaultruthfile; ronpaultruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-233 next last
To: jpsb
What business is it of mine if two people choose to enter into some civil contract?

I'm not an expert in business law, but a civil union is not the same as a mere civil contract. Most contracts have some sort of a "sunset clause" regarding dissolving the contract after a certain period. And why should this civil union have the force of a marriage in matters of taxation, court testimony, inheritance, etc. that a contract would not provide?

81 posted on 03/15/2014 2:22:28 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
I don’t care much about social issues. Financial issues interest me.

I prefer not to live in a Sodom and Gamorrah just because it has a free market economy. And that free market economy would not last long in a immoral environment. We would be right back to crony capitalism and fascism.

82 posted on 03/15/2014 2:24:14 PM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

tyranny at the state level is not any better

whether the tyrants are 1000 miles away or 30 makes no real difference outside a war to overthrow them


83 posted on 03/15/2014 2:29:19 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
84 posted on 03/15/2014 2:29:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

bump


85 posted on 03/15/2014 2:29:44 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Compromise today on one issue, they will be calling for compromise tomorrow on other issues...like fiscal policy or national defense.

I do kinda like Rand but do not want to see him run for President.


86 posted on 03/15/2014 2:30:45 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Rand is trying to be all things to all people. He’s getting too much face time and is going to screw up.


87 posted on 03/15/2014 2:46:43 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (On the wrong side of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Rand Paul: Republicans Need to Soften on Social Issues

Thanks but NO THANKS.

No more RINO Mitt Romney candidates.

The US Constitution limits the Federal Government BOTH Fiscally & Socially. Social tyranny is just as bad if not worse than Fiscal tyranny and in my opinion the two are tied at the hip. The Left illegitimately employs social issues to amass power & redistribute resources & opportunity. Conservatives MUST oppose this onslaught head on.

The culture war between American Individual Liberty & Cultural Collective Marxism will not be won by surrendering to the Marxists.

88 posted on 03/15/2014 2:58:34 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
The libertarian should certainly care about life in the womb

Libertarianism, and naturally most libertarians, are pro-abortion.

It is dishonest to try and tell these folks that libertarianism is not a pro-abortion, pro-gay political movement.

89 posted on 03/15/2014 3:01:53 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
if you can believe the polls

There's the rub. IMHO the polls are just part of the propaganda machine. The real poll like the Prop #8 vote in California is a truer measure. Regardless, there are some things like self-evident truth & unalienable rights that are never legitimately subject to polling or rational moral relative scrutiny by courts. Mob rule is not a true measure of moral legitimacy.

90 posted on 03/15/2014 3:04:07 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
In a way, he's correct. Not soften, but give up on the government doing anything we want. Doing that could give us some hope of salvaging our country. Maybe if we just got the gov out of everyone’s business... Just a thought. I'll never vote for Rand Paul regardless.
91 posted on 03/15/2014 3:04:38 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Rand Paul: Republicans Need to Soften on Social Issues

Americans: The 2nd Amendment is not a fiscal issue; it's a social issue. In the face of a tyrannical mob, do we soften on this issue so we can 'win elections', gain our seats in an illegitimate government?

92 posted on 03/15/2014 3:07:53 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
You don't see how the two are inextricably joined together?
Homosexual "marriage" and all spousal benefits?
Transexuals in the military and the federal subsidizing of their surgeries?
Amnesty for illegal aliens?
The list goes on.
You cannot be a "financial conservative" and not care about social issues because they are what is breaking (has broken) this country.
The government just cannot finance liberalism.

*********************************

Well said.

93 posted on 03/15/2014 3:13:55 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Fiscally he's wrong: Single parents are the primary customers of the welfare and police state.

In terms of liberty he's wrong: Those customers and their handlers both vote for more of the welfare and police state.

The police state regulates the economy for the benefit of its principal benefactors: the tax-exempt foundations of the extremely rich, whose principal goal is to stay on top by killing a free market economy.

Hence, Rand Paul is a statist. Somebody ought to tell him.

94 posted on 03/15/2014 3:24:10 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

....and here we go......................


95 posted on 03/15/2014 3:28:17 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

>When we are forced to pay for other peoples birth control, forced to subsidize women who have out of wedlock children those are not just social but fiscal issues.

Yes, and if there had to be a choice, the safest, less expensive and less damaging to society would be preventing the birth of unwanted kids and stopping the welfare cycle.


96 posted on 03/15/2014 3:29:30 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
.. festooned ..

Oy vey, how freeqin' ghey is that ? !

97 posted on 03/15/2014 3:38:01 PM PDT by tomkat (3%+1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soycd

Wouldn’t it be even safer, cheaper and less damaging to our society if young, unwed women could see the advantage to keeping their knees together?


98 posted on 03/15/2014 3:48:21 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Sorry, Rand.

Not though all the stars fall from the heavens and all the mountains dissolve into the sea. Never.

Never.


99 posted on 03/15/2014 3:48:58 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands (Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

It’s not dishonest for me to say that libertarianism is not pro homo, and not pro abortion. You can disagree, but please don’t imply that I’m a liar.

Your issue is with liberalism and the libertarians that embrace it. Other libertarians like me embrace conservatism.


100 posted on 03/15/2014 3:50:53 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson