Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Natural gas turned into usable fuels with cleaner, cheaper new method
cbc.ca ^ | Mar 14, 2014 10:36 AM ET

Posted on 03/14/2014 12:56:06 PM PDT by ckilmer

Natural gas turned into usable fuels with cleaner, cheaper new method

U.S. scientists discover less complex way of converting gas into liquid products

Thomson Reuters Posted: Mar 14, 2014 10:36 AM ET Last Updated: Mar 14, 2014 10:36 AM ET

'The U.S. has a glut of natural gas, and there are not that many ways to efficiently use it, said Brigham Young University's Daniel Ess, one of the scientists involved in the research.

'The U.S. has a glut of natural gas, and there are not that many ways to efficiently use it, said Brigham Young University's Daniel Ess, one of the scientists involved in the research. (Sue Ogrocki/Associated Press)

   
Facebook
 
8
   
Twitter
 
0
   
Reddit
 
 
   
Share
 
8
   
Email
 

Related Stories

U.S. scientists say they have devised a potentially easier, cheaper and cleaner way to turn natural gas into usable fuels and chemicals - a discovery which could lead to natural gas products displacing oil products in the future.

The process would be less complex than conventional methods to turn natural gas into liquid products and it uses much lower heat and inexpensive materials to get the job done, they said.

Almost anything - fuel or chemical - that can be made from petroleum also can be made from natural gas, but it is not done today because the cost of converting natural gas into those materials is much higher, the researchers said.

"Current technologies to convert natural gas into fuels or commodity chemicals are too expensive to compete with products generated from petroleum," said Roy Periana, director of the Scripps Energy and Materials Center at the Scripps Research Institute in Florida who led the study published in the journal Science.

'This would lead to a paradigm change in the petrochemical industry, increase energy security and facilitate sustainability'- Roy Periana, lead researcher

The finding comes as natural gas production soars in the United States thanks to methods like hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, and horizontal drilling. The United States stands as the world's No. 1 natural gas producer, topping even Russia.

"The U.S. has a glut of natural gas, and there are not that many ways to efficiently use it," said Brigham Young University's Daniel Ess, another of the researchers.

Methane, ethane and propane are the primary components in natural gas. They are members of a class of molecules known as alkanes. But turning alkanes into other useful forms like gasoline and diesel fuel, alcohols or olefins - key sources of industrial chemicals and plastics - can be costly and inefficient with current technologies.

Breaking bonds

Alkanes are made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms joined together by some of the strongest bonds known in chemistry. Converting these alkanes in natural gas requires the breaking of these bonds - no easy task.

New England Power Purchase

Scientists said their conversion process uses much lower temperatures and fewer steps. It also uses inexpensive ordinary metals like thallium and lead rather than costly precious metals like platinum. (Toby Talbot/ Associated Press)

Conventional conversion methods use very high temperatures - more than 900 degrees Celsius. The method - very much like the original conversion process developed in the 1940s - remains costly, not very efficient and can lead to high emissions of pollutants, the researchers said.

These scientists said their conversion process uses much lower temperatures - about 200 degrees Celsius - and fewer steps. It also uses inexpensive ordinary metals like thallium and lead rather than costly precious metals like platinum, palladium, rhodium or gold, they said.

Their process could greatly reduce capital costs of future processing plants, Periana added.

Periana said the process is not immediately ready for commercialization and that additional research is required, but that if all goes well a practical demonstration could occur within three years and a pilot plant could be in place perhaps a year after that.

Gas focus of world economy instead of oil

The researchers have been in touch with potential corporate partners and venture capital firms about creating a separate company or a collaboration with an existing petrochemical company to commercialize the process, Periana said.

Given vast U.S. and other reserves of natural gas, the new process eventually could help change the world economy from one based on oil to one based on natural gas, Periana said.

hi-natural-gas

Almost anything - fuel or chemical - that can be made from petroleum also can be made from natural gas. (Jack Smith/Bloomberg)

"This would lead to a paradigm change in the petrochemical industry, increase energy security and facilitate sustainability, as natural gas is cleaner than petroleum or coal," Periana added.

Like oil, natural gas plays an important geopolitical role.

There are concerns Russia, which has tightened its grip on Ukraine's Crimea peninsula, could slash shipments of natural gas to Europe, nearly half of which go through Ukraine via pipeline.

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner and other supporters of American energy exports have seized on the crisis in Ukraine to pressure President Barack Obama's administration to speed approval of liquid natural gas (LNG) exports, saying doing so could help keep Russia in check.



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: gas; liquidfuel; naturalgas; synfuel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/14/2014 12:56:06 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Instead of natural Gas, could “wood gas” be used?


2 posted on 03/14/2014 12:58:50 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I bet you the process gets rejected by the Dems simply because it uses lead.


3 posted on 03/14/2014 12:59:37 PM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
My husband worked for ARAMCO at their LNG (liquified natural gas) plant in Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia.

It's a GOOD thing that it is safer now. It's a VERY dangerous occupation. They both are EXTREMELY volatile and explosions are commonplace.

So MANY women got on the "male" thing working in once-all-male jobs. THIS one, though, the entire petroleum and natural gas industry has seen NO WOMEN. It's dirty, dangerous and usually FAR from home.
Generally women want safe, clean jobs, close to home.

4 posted on 03/14/2014 1:01:26 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Instead of natural Gas, could “wood gas” be used?

No, the chemical make up of gas and petroleum ISN'T from "living" tissue like wood is. Natural gas and petroleum can't be "grown."

When this planet runs OUT of natural gas and petroleum, and it WILL, then that's all she wrote. Trees can be grown and grown and grown again....RECYCLABLE resource--NOT the petrochemical resources. ONE TIME only.

5 posted on 03/14/2014 1:04:26 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Obama’s not likely to approve liquid natural gas exports because it’s against his policy of investing our money in alternative pixie dust schemes.


6 posted on 03/14/2014 1:05:54 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marko413

All their Marxist, global warming dreams are going up in a blue flame.

They will be mean and desperate.


7 posted on 03/14/2014 1:05:56 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

At the risk of exaggerating, this, the ability to polymerize or otherwise transmute (maybe transmorph would be the better word) nat gas would be the absolute gateway to world energy domination.


8 posted on 03/14/2014 1:09:00 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

That would be bio fuel, which is possible with wood but not as efficient as things like corn or sugar cane which are high yield.


9 posted on 03/14/2014 1:10:02 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST jut FReepmail me..... This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

10 posted on 03/14/2014 1:16:24 PM PDT by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

fyi


11 posted on 03/14/2014 1:18:15 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Sticky caps lock ALERT!


12 posted on 03/14/2014 1:18:16 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
No, the chemical make up of gas and petroleum ISN'T from "living" tissue like wood is.

So, it's abiotic? I guess that would explain the abundance of methane on Saturn's moon Titan.

13 posted on 03/14/2014 1:42:05 PM PDT by glock rocks (If you like your health plan, you're a racist !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

...but without that emphasis, I’d be too slow to understand. Large and bold font helps as well.


14 posted on 03/14/2014 1:49:46 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Lol.


15 posted on 03/14/2014 1:55:12 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
So, it's abiotic? I guess that would explain the abundance of methane on Saturn's moon Titan.

I wouldn't know about Titan. I learned SO much about the petroleum/natural gas industry, without even WANTING to. It's an AMAZING business and I understood why the USA has been so cozy with the Saudis.

The KSA, by the way, has another 200 years of the stuff, PLUS they haven't even BEGUN to look in the "Empty Quarter."

Our good Lord has an ironic sense of humor. Those Bedouins were ONCE God's poorest people on the planet. Then, with the discovery of ALL THE PETROLEUM and NATURAL GAS in the world, they are now the wealthiest.

There are less than 10 million Saudis in the entire country. They don't count women are children so we don't even really know how many Saudis there are.

16 posted on 03/14/2014 2:00:52 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_gas


17 posted on 03/14/2014 2:07:10 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

In the case of Titan, whatever oxygen was there combined either with hydrogen or silicon to make water or rock respecively. Since the outer solar system has a super abundance of hydrogen, some combined with whatever carbon was there to make methane and ethane, while the rest escaped into space. It’s Titan’s thick nitrogen atmosphere which keeps that from boiling away into space as well.


18 posted on 03/14/2014 2:19:19 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Very nice read.

Too bad it doesn't have the kick that petroleum has. However, SOME day the world will be OUT of petroleum and natural gas. It can ALWAYS grow trees.

19 posted on 03/14/2014 5:07:51 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

I don’t quite understand your answer. Woodgas is CO and hydrogen, very reactive and quite useful for building other chemical. My guess is that they have found a low temp way to turn Methane into CO and hydrogen and are building up from there.

If so, it shouldn’t matter whether the carbon source is from under the ground or growing from the ground.

The fact there isn’t enough biomass to replace oil is another matter.


20 posted on 03/14/2014 6:20:03 PM PDT by dangerdoc (I don't think you should be forced to make the same decision I did even if I know I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson