There's no doubt he's conservative.
It appears he has hitched his wagon to the dead horse of nullification. For some reason, proponents of nullification recoil from Article V and paint us as George Soros worshipers whose dark objective is to surreptitiously undermine that which no longer exists, the 1787 constitution.
If you haven't, check out the link within the column by lawyer Joe Wolverton. Among his distortions in supposed support of the Constitution, he cites a quote from the Anti-Federalist Centinel! The intent is to slam us as blind followers of Mark Levin and COS.
Wolverton is smooth and dangerous. We should follow and respond to this guy whenever possible.
COS posted a point by point refutation a few weeks ago. Good ammo for us.
http://www.utahtalkradio.com/Wolverton-Joe.html
Looks like he is a genuine conservative, like the members of the JBS, but really feels the Convention of the States is the wrong way to go.
I disagree with him adamantly on the Convention of the States, but appreciate his concerns.
This is why we conservatives are always at cross-ends in trying to defeat the left. They are a monolithic movement of insentient drones. We are composed of people who think and people who think will tend to disagree.
I hope and pray that Oklahoma's action can be reversed as I truly believe that only by amending some selected parts of the Constitution to address abuses the Founding Fathers could never have conceptualized, can e save our republic.
At the same time, I do not reject nullification. I feel these are both useful tools in dealing with the statists and Bolsheviks who are opposing us in the Federal Government.