To: mandaladon
Yes, good news indeed if the DemocRATS can’t “find” enough additional votes.
Once again, the so called Libertarian candidate almost handed it to the progressive DemocRat candidate.
To: House Atreides
We should encourage a Green to run to offset the libertarian damage.
8 posted on
03/11/2014 5:03:05 PM PDT by
citizen
(There is always free government cheese in the mouse trap.....https://twitter.com/kracker0)
To: House Atreides
Was the libertarian another RAT plant?
12 posted on
03/11/2014 5:04:59 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Don't twerk me, Broi)
To: House Atreides
That is a problem.
There are a lot of Soros funded Libertarian and Tea Party candidates that are not real and are there to shrink the vote to favor Democrats.
Then where there are real candidates the same thing at times happens.
24 posted on
03/11/2014 5:20:36 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: House Atreides
“..almost handed it to the progressive DemocRat candidate..”
That is what scares me about the General election. The Perot syndrome - a third candidate could sink our ship. It is also in the DNC playbook. They have been known to pay right leaning candidates to run as third party to siphon off Republican/Conservative. It works.
29 posted on
03/11/2014 5:25:26 PM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson