Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hong Kong pilot spots debris in Vietnamese waters
CCTV English ^ | 03-11-2014 0617 bjt | James

Posted on 03/11/2014 3:51:38 PM PDT by tcrlaf

The Civil Aviation Department of Hong Kong has received a pilot’s report that a large amount of debris was spotted in Vietnamese waters.

The pilot, flying a Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur plane, says the debris is located about 60 kilometres southeast of Vietnamese city Vung Tau, some 500 kilometers from where the Malaysian jetliner lost contact with air traffic controllers. The department has submitted the message to the relevant authorities.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 777; australia; china; chinashotitdown; crash; hongkong; iran; jrt; malaysia; mh370; oceaninfinity; oilrig; oilrigworker; philippines; roaringforties; seabedconstructor; shotdownbychinese; southchinasea; spratlies; spratlyislands; spratlys; thephilippines; thespratlys; vietman; vietnam; vungtau; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-244 next last
To: Norm Lenhart

That IS the question! I depends on how hard you kick them I think which will be considerable in most American cases.


161 posted on 03/11/2014 8:35:31 PM PDT by lwoodham (Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

People tend to look at people and think “Nah look at them, they look too young to be terrorists” anything is possible at this point..the fact that the co-pilot has apparently NO issue with letting total strangers into the cockpit for international flights who knows, maybe he was paid off to let them take over the plane. You have not one but TWO transponders shut down, isnt that what the 9/11 hijackers did, following the same MO


162 posted on 03/11/2014 8:36:05 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Unfortunately yes


163 posted on 03/11/2014 8:36:21 PM PDT by lwoodham (Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Ok, I’m on it :)


164 posted on 03/11/2014 8:37:02 PM PDT by lwoodham (Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: lwoodham

Great :-) I sent you a tweet not knowing if it was you or not you know how twitter is


165 posted on 03/11/2014 8:39:01 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn

As has been pointed out on this thread, over 200 eye-witnesses saw a missile.

This isn’t an OES obedience training website.


166 posted on 03/11/2014 8:43:38 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

The only question I honestly have is why are people so ready to accept any possibility but the most obvious. Now sure, it is totally possible the jet ate a flock of geese and augered in. Or had ‘something’ non Muslim happen to it.

But we collectively HAVE bought the drama that it’s ALWAYS something else. We don’t want to admit that it is likely the case because of what that would mean. More TSA, More BS etc.

We on the right are getting WAY to comfortable with accepting the MSM and fedgov BS, much as we claim not to be. Look at the Russia threads. These missing airplane threads. Spin and disinfo are being accepted and argued over by many.

But just perhaps the most obvious answer is the correct one.


167 posted on 03/11/2014 8:45:01 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn

A missile TOWARDS the plane that is.

Or are you admitting a missile in the immediate area of an exploding plane while claiming the two aren’t connected?! LOL, hey, go for it.


168 posted on 03/11/2014 8:48:49 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Happy33 blew up in mid-air due to a short in a fuel void, as did 800. There was at least one occurrence on the ground that also totaled an aircraft.

Oh, by the way, a gas combusting as a result of an ignition source is not "spontaneous".

169 posted on 03/11/2014 8:52:45 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Well uhhh....the people next door had sex and my girlfriend got pregnant! It was a miracle I tell you! A MIRACLE!!!!

;)


170 posted on 03/11/2014 8:53:49 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

And jet fuel combusting with a spark is ‘miraculous.’


171 posted on 03/11/2014 8:54:45 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Yes, and all were interviewed and no missile parts were ever recovered from the seafloor.


172 posted on 03/11/2014 9:29:47 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The reason I put “missile” in quote marks should be obvious. Now go be a troll somewhere else.


173 posted on 03/11/2014 9:30:29 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I was waiting to see if anyone mentioned that Sarah. That is my theory. the Navy was holding missle exercises in that area. I think the wires got crossed and they shot down the plane. You know that the government would move heaven and earth to cover up something like that. Friendly fire.


174 posted on 03/11/2014 9:33:41 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Of course..and that is why the media keeps on saying that it was “Mechanical failure” they are doing the same with this plane, only a few have mentioned that if this particular plane had a catastrophic mechanical failure, how come it was able to fly for hundreds of miles more..if a plane is capable of doing that, its capable of keeping the transponders ON to notify everyone of where they are..notice how the media is bringing all the usual goons out of the woodwork to talk about this, Schiavo, even today I heard Kaldstrom talk, where the hell has he been all these years


175 posted on 03/11/2014 9:38:02 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
But was it a MANPAD?

Most MANPAD systems have a maximum engagement altitude of just under 10,000 feet, so you forget about a Stinger or Russian MANPAD system taking down TWA Flight 800. But there is one air defense system reasonably portable enough to do the job: the 9M33 (SA-8 Gecko) missile.

From middle 1980's on, the Soviets sold many 9K33M3 mobile SAM systems to a number of countries in the Middle East. With a maximum rang of 9.3 miles and capable to engaging targets as high as 40,000 feet, the 9K33M3 was potentially a formidable anti-aircraft system. It's possible that terrorists got their hands on 9K33M3 vehicles and figured out a way to "jury rig" a launch system that could fit on a small ship, complete with the guidance radar. It is possible that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by such a jury rigged system, a system that is not known to law enforcement authorities at the time of TWA Flight 800 crash.

176 posted on 03/11/2014 9:42:15 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

roger that lol!


177 posted on 03/11/2014 10:16:10 PM PDT by BrianE ("Dead at 25 buried at 65 the average American" - Benjamin Franklin 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Inside job. Co Pilot?


178 posted on 03/11/2014 10:33:34 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Nobody owes you a living, so shut up and get back to work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn
The reason I put “missile” in quote marks should be obvious. Now go be a troll somewhere else.

LOL, take a pill, darlin. The issue is not changed by your attitude. This subject is so thoroughly researched I have no need of producing anything - a half second on Google will give anyone all the links they need.

But the Clintons no doubt appreciate your efforts to beat the dead horse and rewrite history - after all, it's their very fingerprints. She Who Must Be Crawled To will surely give you an extra pat on the head at your weekly review! Bwahahahaha!

179 posted on 03/11/2014 11:25:15 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
But was it a MANPAD? Most MANPAD systems have a maximum engagement altitude of just under 10,000 feet, so you forget about a Stinger or Russian MANPAD system taking down TWA Flight 800. But there is one air defense system reasonably portable enough to do the job: the 9M33 (SA-8 Gecko) missile.

From middle 1980's on, the Soviets sold many 9K33M3 mobile SAM systems to a number of countries in the Middle East. With a maximum rang of 9.3 miles and capable to engaging targets as high as 40,000 feet, the 9K33M3 was potentially a formidable anti-aircraft system. It's possible that terrorists got their hands on 9K33M3 vehicles and figured out a way to "jury rig" a launch system that could fit on a small ship, complete with the guidance radar. It is possible that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by such a jury rigged system, a system that is not known to law enforcement authorities at the time of TWA Flight 800 crash.

Perhaps. But it also could have been US Navy out of a sub. At the time, a report was made about purely electronic training and practice missile firings that had, occasionaly, actually fired a missile by mistake. So whether it was an accident, or naval black ops under the cover of a mistake, no one knows. But the massive amount of documented witnesses, the subsequent testimonies of witness intimidation by the FBI, the explosive residue tested on the fabric of the seats, the blast hole in side (not bottom) of the reassembled fuselage, the virtual impossibility of reproducing a center fuel tank explosion and the complete lack of any other such explosion in all of aviation history, etc., etc., etc, make the missile explanation rock solid and beyond question.

So, it was a coverup. Gee, a coverup involving dead people during the Clinton administration. How unusual, huh?

180 posted on 03/11/2014 11:33:33 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson