Posted on 03/11/2014 8:08:23 AM PDT by Sopater
A Connecticut man revealed shocking comments made by a Branford police officer this week who has openly defended door-to-door gun confiscation.
After the tragic Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, Conn. lawmakers mandated that all assault rifles and high capacity magazines be banned, requiring all in circulation to be registered with the state. Fearing the obvious move towards confiscation, the vast majority of gun owners have refused to submit, with estimates finding less than 13 percent of rifles being registered.
Navy veteran and firefighter John Cinque, who made national news after telling state lawmakers he would not comply with gun registration, briefly commented on the officers statements in a discussion with gubernatorial candidate Joe Visconti last Friday.
Ive had contact with a police officer in my home town, I live in Branford, and his words straight out were, I cannot wait to get the order to kick your door in, Cinque said.
In an exclusive interview with Storyleak, Cinque further detailed the disturbing comments made by Branford Police Officer Joseph Peterson, one of the states most highly decorated officers.
WarrantWarrantZZZIt happened on facebook he posted to a thread on my wall, Cinque said. I have known him personally for 20 years. He was interacting with other friends of mine and it was directly about the video.
In multiple screenshots captured from the lengthy conversation, Peterson continually argued that law enforcement were not obligated to defy unconstitutional laws. Instead, Peterson stated that he would follow any order given, even if it meant confiscating firearms from close friends.
But like I said I didnt make the law, Peterson told Cinque. But if it comes down to that then I guess we see how you would respond
Im not going for any warrants but if my dept gets them and we have to serve them I will see you then.
As the conversations audience continued to grow, Peterson repeated his pledge, telling multiple people that he would never hesitate to carry out confiscation.
So if they make a law confiscating guns You will enforce it? a Cameron Smith asks in a separate screenshot as Peterson reiterates his stance.
LeftNutPeterson0Angered by comments pointing out the states unconstitutional law, Peterson goes as far as to say that he would love to knock down Smiths door personally.
I give my left nut to bang down your door and come for your gun, Peterson said. Hey everyone Cameron is a criminal law breaking psycho.
Receiving considerable backlash, Peterson quietly disabled his Facebook page following the conversation, although a screenshot was obtained beforehand.
Despite the inability of several officers to understand what a constitutional law entails, Cinque revealed that countless Conn. officers are opposed to the states ruling.
As for the cops who will stand with the people there are many, Cinque said. None have spoken publicly but in private i know many who do not like this one bit they realize they are being used.
They are supporters of the Constitutional rights of the people, but they need to speak publicly soon.
Officer Petersons mentality is eerily similar to that of Conn. State Police Spokesman Lt. Paul Vance, who recently told one woman that he was the master after being asked about gun confiscation.
Although police have begun sending out letters demanding residents comply with the law, Second Amendment activists are standing by their line in the sand. As the police leadership takes its time to analyze the situation, one gun group is now demanding the law be enforced or repealed.
If the state does not have the stomach to enforce these laws, then the legislature has until May 7th, 2014 to completely repeal these immoral edicts and let the residents of Connecticut return to their rightfully owned property and former exercise of constitutional rights and practices without any threat of State violence, a press release from Connecticut Carry reads.
Also last month, gun blogger Mike Vanderboegh was informed that multiple cops and politicians wanted him dead for sending a 16,000 word email to the Conn. State Police and the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. In the email, Vanderboegh warned that violence would surely unfold if officers attempted confiscation.
Despite denial by a few, the agenda of the countrys most powerful gun control groups has been thoroughly exposed. Only one month after the Sandy Hook shooting, rejected democrat proposals from New Yorks SAFE Act gun bill were revealed to include outright gun confiscation. New York mayor Andrew Cuomo even publicly supported the idea, stating, You could say confiscation is an option during an interview on station WGDJ.
Also last month, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. Mayor John C. Tkazyik announced his resignation from Michael Bloombergs Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG) group, pointing out the groups hidden gun confiscation agenda.
Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens, Tkazyik wrote. Nearly 50 pro-Second Amendment mayors have left the organization. They left for the same reason I did.
During a Moms Demand Action gun control rally last year, a group that recently merged with MAIG, Austin, Texas City Councilman Mike Martinez admitted that his group was pushing gun control in order to reach an outright ban as well.
Unfortunately for them, even with tens of millions of dollars, the popularity of such groups continues to plummet even faster than the countrys gun crime.
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.
Man’s a fool and a big-mouth! What a stupid thing to say!
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?”
In the decades following WWII, a number of Jews said the very same thing.
Far smarter to just do it...
I agree it is not an easy job. I have retired and current relatives that are law enforcement and the stories they tell sometimes are heart breaking and it is mentally and emotionally challenging for them.
However, this person is clearly a danger to the citizenry and as I posted will use the “I was following orders...” excuse. If he will gleefully kick someones door down and assault them in their home for gun confiscation what else will he use it for? Shoot to kill? No arrests? Fire into a crowd?
I bet this cop listens to a lot of Wagner
I’m surprised that their police Dept. allowed someone with an IQ below 50 to get the job.
If someone is so fearful of those who would need to use their weapons to protect their rights, it makes me very nervous that these people have any power at all.
- Sopater
Remember, “Head Shots.” Otherwise, you’re just playing target practice with a bullet-proof vest.
“The Silence should be employed today on the likes of Peterson and a good many others.”
The Silence, a public shunning and ostracism, is a great tactic. Sell him no food, no gas, no clothing. The other necessary element to fight state fascism is to elect a pro-2nd amendment, Constitutional sheriff in your county. With a constitutional sheriff you can:
1. Investigate left wing fascists.
2. Throw these fascists in jail.
3. Run rogue police chiefs and cops out of the county.
4. Bar federal fascists from entering the county.
5. Buy surplus munitions.
6. Muster and train a volunteer 2,000 man armed deputy auxiliary - one battalion - for “emergencies.”
I can assure everyone that state-sponsored terrorist groups are very afraid of sheriffs who can bring armed muscle to a dance.
See ya!!
Americans have no appetite for duplicating and repeating the German creation of Hitler's Willing Executioners!
Kinetic enegy.
Even if the oaf has rifle resistant plates (Most dont) The ENERGY goes into his flesh. Enough shots, jello guts and he's dead.
You can stun him long enough to get a good head shot....
An Unconstitutional Law is Void.
“just following orders” got you a Nuremburg Necktie.
- Representative Henry A. Waxman
Mr. Waxman's ancestors can be seen in the distance, in the red coats.
The police need to understand that the ones who voted for this law will not be the ones putting their lives at risk to enforce it.
How many police officers will die before they decide to no longer enforce it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.