Replies

1 posted on 03/10/2014 5:08:47 PM PDT by Olog-hai

So, we killed old Colonel Q for nothing.

2 posted on 03/10/2014 5:12:05 PM PDT by Viennacon

We need to turn Teheran into a sea of glass.

5 posted on 03/10/2014 5:24:22 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)

8 posted on 03/10/2014 5:30:11 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)

Imagine that! They were Iranian. . .coincidentally. . .

UK Telegraph: Mystery fake-passport holders on flight MH370 were Iranian
A BBC Persian report says that the two Iranians on the Malaysia Airlines plane had bought the fake passports in order to migrate to Germany and Denmark
The two men travelling on stolen passports on the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 that mysteriously disappeared on Saturday have been identified as Iranian nationals.
A BBC Persian report quotes an Iranian friend of one of the men, who said he hosted the pair in Kuala Lumpur after they arrived from Tehran in the days preceding their flight to Beijing.
The friend, who knew one of the men from his school days in Iran, said the men had bought the fake passports because they wanted to migrate to Europe.
The pair were travelling on passports belonging to Christian Kozel, an 30-year-old Austrian, and Luigi Maraldi, a 37-year-old Italian.
They had bought the passports in Kuala Lumpur as well as tickets to Amsterdam, via Beijing.

9 posted on 03/10/2014 5:42:16 PM PDT by wtd

After a period, the truth usually comes out.

Twenty-eight years for Pan Am 103, fifty and counting on the Kennedy assassination, just fifteen with the downing of TWA 800. That one may get resolved before all he!! breaks loose in the next and final ME conflict, although I have my doubts.

Col. "Bo" Gritz, no flaming liberal he, had it pegged within days of the bombing as Iran's doing, in retaliation for the accidental shoot-down of an Iranian civil aviation Airbus by our Navy six months earlier. But then nobody would take seriously a "conspiracy theorist."

10 posted on 03/10/2014 5:46:04 PM PDT by logician2u

The case against Iran/Syria and PFLP-GC seemed pretty clear just months after the Lockerbie disaster, but then the first Gulf war followed by the Madrid conference and Syria and the palis were politically off-limits....

14 posted on 03/10/2014 8:43:03 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)

What difference, at this point, does it make?

(This is why you just blow up all your enemies - certainty.)

15 posted on 03/11/2014 1:14:37 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (HELL, NO! BE UNGOVERNABLE! --- ISLAM DELENDA EST)

To: Olog-hai; onyx; SJackson; SunkenCiv

From this article (Lockerbie Doubts ):

The direction of the case shifted dramatically in the fall of 1990 as President George H.W. Bush was scrambling to assemble a coalition to drive Iraqi troops out of Kuwait. The Bush administration was in need of Iranian and Syrian help, too, in freeing U.S. hostages then held by Islamic militant groups in Lebanon.

And a most pertinent and valuable conclusion:

How did we get so far off track on this story? In part, by not having a truly independent media to investigate and report on the truth behind this case.