[Hugh the Scot]

You seem to be suffering from a serious comprehension problem. I certaimly did not advocate for homosexualizing the military.

Beyond that, you do seem to be making my point rather well. congress has been making laws regarding marriage since 1780, and they STILL don’t have it straight.

Nice job of avoiding the main point though. While your positions on abortion and homos and whatnot may be absolutely correct; what, under your preferred set of rules, stops the leftists in your all- powerful government from deciding at some point that homosexuality is the PREFERRED situation? Congress could just pass another law, right? Constitutional limits on government power is the only answer.

[ansel12]

Every argument that you’ve made against homosexuals serving in the military, could equally be used by the left as an argument to exclude Catholics. I deplore homosexuality as a sin against God and a crime against nature. However, I did serve honorably (and alongside some homos). Their homosexuality affected my service not one whit. They carried their weapons the same way I carried mine.

You have a strange way of arguing against homosexuals in the military, and I have no idea what you meant about Catholics, nor even what arguments that I have made on the reasons for keeping homosexuals out of the military, I didn't think that we would even need to get started on explaining How homosexuality in the military hurts us.

Now you want to waste time pretending that we should be discussing just ending marriage period, the true libertarian position of whatever.

People can do whatever now, but you know very well that you won't be removing societally recognized, legal marriage in America.