You have a strange way of arguing against homosexuals in the military, and I have no idea what you meant about Catholics, nor even what arguments that I have made on the reasons for keeping homosexuals out of the military, I didn't think that we would even need to get started on explaining How homosexuality in the military hurts us.
Now you want to waste time pretending that we should be discussing just ending marriage period, the true libertarian position of whatever.
People can do whatever now, but you know very well that you won't be removing societally recognized, legal marriage in America.
Nor will I be confusing societal recognition for the brute force of law.
Your disengenuous arguments amount to nothing more than ad hominem attacks and obfuscation. You have a very twisted view of what us little (l) libertarians actually support and why. In short; you’re just trolling.
Homosexuals already have exactly the same rights regarding marriage that you have. And they always have had them. Even way back in 1780.
Any man has the right to marry the woman he can talk into it, more or less. It’s no more legitimate for two males (or two females) to claim marriage based on their carnal proclivities than it would be for two heterosexual males to do so for the purposes of income tax evasion, in other, simpler words; being queer does not factor into it at all. JUST LIKE MILITARY SERVICE. There is NO CONFLICT between failing to exclude someone from military service, and also failing to allow those same people to redefine the institution of marriage.
How would you go about excluding gays from military service? It can’t be done. They’ll lie and get in anyway...
Now what?
People are going to do stuff you don’t like.
I’m done.