Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mgist
"Growing" heroin "epidemic" -- only static sponges and the gullible believe this claptrap. I'll bet that if numbers were crunched, there are probably considerably fewer heroin addicts today, proportionate to populations, than there were in the 1950s and even in the late 1800s.

Weakness of character was behind Hoffman's addiction, the same as it was behind the heroin addiction of the fictional character Sherlock Holmes. Conan Doyle, a tolerant and spiritual guy, knew of what he wrote -- at a time when many otherwise good and upstanding Britishmen were closet opium addicts. That's not even mentioning the laudanum addicts, which included perfectly respectable ladies and gents, in America in the 1800s.

Drug addition is a spiritual malaise whose solution lies 90 percent with religion, and only 10 percent with government. But those who seek to use government, both right and left, confuse government's role with religion's role.

52 posted on 03/08/2014 10:08:31 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

Very good post. I’d also suggest that the use of the term “epidemic” to describe any and all personal and social disorders doesn’t help, either. An epidemic is a medical condition that is dangerous to a large population simply because it can be spread through casual contact. Heroin abuse isn’t an “epidemic” any more than alcoholism is a “disease,” and pretending otherwise results in a gross misuse of public resources.


63 posted on 03/08/2014 12:40:22 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson