Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: H.Akston

Grimes winning is bad on multiple levels. It would also be the BIG story coming out of the election, sucking up the media oxygen and undercutting any GOP gains (or even a Senate takeover).

And it would also undercut the Conservative agenda by allowing Dems to stand their ground on the notion that the election was “complex” and had no meaning. I’ve seen Libs trot the danger McConnells in along these lines already, completely unwilling to acknowlege that he’s in trouble because his Conservative base is disgusted with him and is walking away.


72 posted on 03/06/2014 12:16:07 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter
Grimes winning is bad on multiple levels. It would also be the BIG story coming out of the election, sucking up the media oxygen and undercutting any GOP gains (or even a Senate takeover).

You are right about that.

A Grimes win in the general against McConnell would allow Democrats to say that the mid-term election was not a referendum on Obama, but that it was a rejection of the Tea Party.

A Grimes win against Bevin would be a different story. That story would be about fueling the GOP feud between establishment and the righ-wing conservatives, and about the Tea Party not being "electable" in an election.

-PJ

79 posted on 03/06/2014 1:26:43 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson