Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic

She is hiding information that could potentionally remove the current occupant of 1600 Penn Ave. He’s done what Nixon only dreamed of doing. If that were not the case, she would’ve been told by her boss to tell the truth. It was in response to the Supremes ruling on political donations by corporations. Remember the scolding they got at the state of the union speech and judge Alito’s lip response?


10 posted on 03/06/2014 4:21:54 AM PST by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: b4its2late

You’re right. And I’m not sure what we can do about it. All our laws - and our constitution - depend on the basic willingness of people to go along with them. Obama, like Clinton before him but much more egregiously so, simply regards them as worth less than the paper they’re written on. They’re not even suggestions, in his mind, and we have no power to enforce them unless the government acknowledges their validity.

Wasn’t Holder found in contempt himself? And what was the effect of that? He just ignored it.

Also, there’s no way he’s going to appoint a Special Prosecutor.


19 posted on 03/06/2014 4:44:07 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late

Your right this was all instigated by an enraged President because of the Citizens United case,look at the time line when Obama yelled at the Supremes at the State of the union speech and Feb 11 when Lerner was set in motion


40 posted on 03/06/2014 8:21:06 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson