Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/03/2014 2:49:41 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

2 posted on 03/03/2014 2:50:50 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Separately, the high court is taking up a North Carolina case in which the state's dental regulatory board argues that only dentists should be allowed to whiten teeth

Dentists want the courts/government to keep people from whitening their own teeth?

4 posted on 03/03/2014 2:53:08 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’ve got a beard because it cuts the shaving time WAY down.
I only have to open up and dump the Norelco about once a month.


5 posted on 03/03/2014 2:53:15 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The Supreme Court should be handling the ever so constitutionally vague... teeth whitening SCANDAL?

what do white teeth have to do with constitutional matters?


6 posted on 03/03/2014 2:54:25 PM PST by MeshugeMikey (Jesus came to Save not Entertain / Ground John Kerry Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

High Court To Examine Facial Hair, Teeth-Whitening?

Did they install mirrors in the courtroom?..................


7 posted on 03/03/2014 2:54:48 PM PST by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Don’t they have any better cases to look at?


8 posted on 03/03/2014 2:56:22 PM PST by plainshame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
How to Brush Teeth
9 posted on 03/03/2014 2:57:06 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The same court that admitted it was “evading” the usurper’s eligibility. John Jay is rolling in his grave.


12 posted on 03/03/2014 3:00:36 PM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Here is something no one seems to know. Circumstances led me to start an investigation. I am an attorney and have access to all the usual legal databases. I’m on my second petition of certiorari to the Supreme Court in the last six months - same issue. I expect to be ignored a second time. Same issue the SCOTUS has ignored for decades.

Every government entity, except one, is subject to the due process clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendments.

Anyone care to guess?


33 posted on 03/03/2014 3:53:33 PM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Maybe they’ll rediscover the Commerce Clause. That would be delightful. Oh, for the Lochner days!


36 posted on 03/03/2014 4:11:32 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

But homeschooling German seeking religious asylum - Ahh - go scratch!!


38 posted on 03/03/2014 6:48:32 PM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson