Posted on 03/03/2014 11:37:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind
They never learn nor do they want to learn.
This was not a free-to-discriminate bill. This was a bill to allow businesses to opt out of participating in the celebration of perversity.
Homosexuals are free to buy cakes without discrimination. They are not free to force Christians to participate in a perverse homosexual ‘wedding’.
Why is it NOT ok for cake makers to refuse service to gay couples? Why is ok for a gay hair dresser to refuse service to a non gay client?
Shhhh, you’ll only confuse her.
For full disclosure I only scanned the article, speed reading.
So if I missed something, well that`s life, I pretty much know what K Powers has to say.
She claims to have become a Christian recently (God Bless Her)
But so far have seen no evidence to go along with her claim, Again God Bless her!
I personally cant see a person coming to Christ sincerely and still remaining to hold the same values as had prior more or less
I dont put much credibility in what she has to say, the other night she called Hannity out on his so called family values, HER WORDS and I paraphrase
I noticed Jonah Goldberg mentioned in the article
whenever I here or see his name I remember back a number of years ago when I saw and heard him say the following on tv
Jonah “I wish the republican party would give up on it`s family values platform so we can start winning elections again” That was his EXACT words, no paraphrase, and so he has very little credibility either
RE: Why is ok for a gay hair dresser to refuse service to a non gay client?
Not sure if she’ll agree with you that this is also OK...
Wow, she sure talks a lot for someone so clueless...
I live in AZ. I actually took the time to download the bill and read it. Twice. I was shocked (I don’t know why) at how much the media lied about it. They did the same thing with. 1070. The first thing I ask people who bad mouth the law is: “Have you read it.” I have yet to hear a yes...
It's your business. If you don't want to sell to/serve/whatever anyone, for whatever reason, you don't have to. Maybe they were today's thirteenth person in the door and you think that's unlucky, or you have a superstition about people with one green eye and one blue one--whatever.
You have the right to refuse service to anyone, and if the marketplace doesn't like it, you may go out of business.
But that would not be because the government told you had to pay someone who was offended because you wouldn't serve them.
No where in the Constitution does it say you have a right to go through life without being offended.
If I had that right, then most of government would be looking for work.
Kirsten is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
She’s that lifeless fish that says nothing on TV.
If it’s NOT ok, I would hope she would be consistent and says so.
Regarding her comment, wouldn’t it be just a stack of juicy irony if Miz Powers favoured padded bras?
I had a friend who went to a flaming gay hairdresser for a long time. When she brought her Bible to read during her hair appointments, his attitude toward her changed until she finally had to go elsewhere.
What few dollars I have I gladly spend on places where people appreciate regular customers. Who doesn’t appreciate me, can get their dollars from someone else.
That’s because Jonah and his mom, Lucianne, are so close.
HF
You are correct. I also see this as a property rights issue. Your business is YOUR property, in a sane world to do with as you will. The free market should be handling this. Alas, we are no longer a free people.
The headline doesn’t match the article. Carlos Danger’s ex-GF spent the entire article claiming the conservatives were the ones distorting the facts in the argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.