Skip to comments.
President Obama - America Will Not Be Able To Defend Israel
Political Realities ^
| 03/03/14
| LD Jackson
Posted on 03/03/2014 5:48:01 AM PST by LD Jackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: LD Jackson
Hey owebama, you posterior orifice, don’t ever expect me to protect you.
21
posted on
03/03/2014 6:19:45 AM PST
by
Rannug
("all enemies, foreign and domestic")
To: LD Jackson
Most American Jews I know voted for the bastard.
22
posted on
03/03/2014 6:21:34 AM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
I didnt know Israel was the 51st state. Neither is South Korea, or Taiwan, or several other countries with which we have defense agreements. Same with NATO. Do you renege on your contracts?
Oh wait. You're not singling out Israel's defense agreement to ignore, are you? Pat, is that you?
23
posted on
03/03/2014 6:23:36 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: LD Jackson
President Obama - America Will Not Be Able To Defend Israel - Certainly not as long as Baraq Hussein 0bama remains Usurper in Chief!
24
posted on
03/03/2014 6:30:44 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
To: COBOL2Java
No, I'm not singling out Israel. All these treaties, those Cold War relics, should be repudiated as the special one time case of a militant monolithic Marxism and a war-devastated world that led to their signing no longer exist. These are the ultimate entangling alliances that George Washington warned us against.
We got the world though the Cold War. We don't owe anybody a thing.
To: LD Jackson
Great picture of The 0ne at the article. He cannot meet Bibi’s eyes.
26
posted on
03/03/2014 6:35:01 AM PST
by
DBrow
To: LD Jackson
He doesn’t seem much interested in backing the U.S.,so why would he back Israel?
27
posted on
03/03/2014 6:37:35 AM PST
by
oldtech
To: allendale
Tell us more about these “changing demographics”.
I want numbers and data sources.
And please, politics and demographics are NOT synonymous!
CA....
28
posted on
03/03/2014 6:40:37 AM PST
by
Chances Are
(Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
To: LD Jackson
Able has nothing to do with it. He hates Israel so will never support it.
29
posted on
03/03/2014 6:41:39 AM PST
by
bgill
To: Colonel Kangaroo
30
posted on
03/03/2014 6:51:15 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: Colonel Kangaroo
All these treaties, those Cold War relics, should be repudiated as the special one time case of a militant monolithic Marxism and a war-devastated world that led to their signing no longer exist. These are the ultimate entangling alliances that George Washington warned us against. We got the world though the Cold War. We don't owe anybody a thing.
Militant Marxism no longer exists? Ever hear of Islam?
So we'll let the Muslims throw the Jews into the sea and take over Africa; sit back and let the ChiComms take Taiwan and for good measure, the Philippines; let a nuclear war begin between Japan and the Norks; and let Putin have the old USSR territories back. Then, he and the Caliphate can start to carve apart what's left of Western Europe. England's practically halfway towards bowing to Mecca as it is.
Who cares, right? Not our problem! the USA can just sit back and let the world go by. Oh wait, who's that knocking at our door?
31
posted on
03/03/2014 6:53:46 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: COBOL2Java
Islam is not a monolith. Even Sunni Islam is bitterly divided against itself. Removing the meddling American presence in their lands, another Cold War relic, they are less likely to join forces against us than are the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
To: Colonel Kangaroo
True. There was absolutely zero US interest in that adventure.
Agree with Iraq and Afghanistan or not, we had interest in both. We were already at war in Iraq and Saddam repeatedly broke his terms of surrender. Afghanistan openly housed terrorists that killed thousands of Americans. Syria is of importance, but of no direct threat to us.
33
posted on
03/03/2014 7:02:41 AM PST
by
ilgipper
To: LD Jackson
With Obama&Co you know what it was like to be on the Titanic.
34
posted on
03/03/2014 7:04:36 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: FreedomGuru
“Under Obama, America wont be able to defend America, and he wont try.”
That’s the whole, naked truth.
35
posted on
03/03/2014 7:04:56 AM PST
by
Marguerite
(When I'm good, I'm very good, but when I'm bad, I'm even better)
To: LD Jackson
“Personally, I would have liked to heard Netanyahu’s reaction when he heard what President Obama had to say.”
Bibi doesn’t count on Obama to defend Israel. He counts on Tsahal. All Bibi wants from Barry is that he stops meddling, and get off his shoulders that horse-faced clown, I named Kerry.
36
posted on
03/03/2014 7:08:12 AM PST
by
Marguerite
(When I'm good, I'm very good, but when I'm bad, I'm even better)
To: LD Jackson
President Obama - America Will Not Be Able To Defend IsraelHe and his handlers, the whole administration, are devout Jew-hating muslim sympathizers . . . ergo, Israel is on its own.
37
posted on
03/03/2014 7:11:42 AM PST
by
laweeks
To: LD Jackson
President Obama - America Will Not . . . Defend Israel We knew that many years ago:
I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
- Barack Hussein Obama
38
posted on
03/03/2014 7:12:13 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: LD Jackson
Since Obama the mooselimb won’t even try.
39
posted on
03/03/2014 7:14:16 AM PST
by
CodeToad
(Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
To: freeangel
“Most American Jews I know voted for the bastard.”
Which is why I support Israel but am puzzled by the liberal nature of American jews.
40
posted on
03/03/2014 7:15:29 AM PST
by
CodeToad
(Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson