Connecticut Police to Begin Door-to-Door Gun Confiscations

VisiontoAmerica ^ | March 1, 2014 | unknown

[Daffynition]

The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 100,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony.

The legislature of CT says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the CT legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway......

[sjmjax]

One State at a time.

This is if, when and where we find out if we are worthy of our founders. And, what the future hold for us all.

[BlackElk]

ping for later

[Pox]

I’m more than happy to oblige! I hope it doesn’t cost too much for you to acquire some extra strength “Butt Hurt Cream” to soothe the pain! :)

[baddog 219]

[Arthur McGowan]

The “liberals” have already killed 57 million Americans.

Anyone who think our current type of “liberal” isn’t a psychopathic murderer is too stupid to live.

OF COURSE they will kill some gun owners in these raids, and claim the gun owners started firing.

[Kevmo]

The fact that we are heading to a Soft Tyranny.
***We’re IN a Soft Tyranny. We’re headed for a Hard Tyranny.

The people that want to keep their freedoms will know when that time comes.
***I want to keep my freedoms. Some of them have already been lost. I do not know when “that time comes”. That is why I am asking.

The big ferinstance is NAZI Germany and jews. They first started by simple harrassment, then fumbling discrimination, then aggressive shaming accompanied by registration, then rounding up and putting jews into ghettos, then concentration camps, then death camps. The jews had been pushed around so much that there was no indication that their final destination was death. There was no good indicator that it was time for them to stand up and fight because they were gonna die anyways.

[Kevmo]

You’re a genuine, 100% adam henry. T4BTT. and try Alcoholics Anonymous.

[Kevmo]

As this thread would indicate, they ARE coming and taking them.

[Vermont Lt]

You ain’t burying anything in these parts without a fire and a backhoe. The ground is frozen solid.

[Kevmo]

They should go God.
***Again, The Manichean/Mencken fallacy.

[Kevmo]

No, you are trying to abstract a principle that is organic in the love of God, and live it out isolated on a purely worldly plane.
***Religious mumbo jumbo gobbledygook word salad. Speak Plainly. You are not Christ — and even He spoke plainly after a certain time.

[MarkL]

At one point, the information collected during background checks was supposed to be dumped after the verification was complete. Don’t know if that is still true.

The FOPA of 1986 outlawed the feds keeping those records. On the other hand, when's the last time this regime has followed any law that doesn't further their nefarious schemes.

Mark

[Kevmo]

Good insight. Thanks.

[Chode]

that should make=em stand up on their hind legs and take notice...

[MasterGunner01]

Extrapolating from current events as we know them, we come up with the worst case scenario. Again, we don't know if sanity will prevail. if it does not, then this is likely to happen as Mike Vanderboegh has warned on many occasions.

The critical and unanswered question is whether the specter of civil war will cause the politicians to back off, or will the politicians order the cops to enforce compliance? This will trigger a crisis of conscience within the law enforcement community. Some cops will refuse and become outlaws; others will side with the politicians. The willing collaborators will be sent to terrorize and intimidate the CT citizens.

At some point, CT law enforcement will use deadly force (probably sooner than later). The victim may be a gun owner or even a non-gun owning innocent civilian. In the worst case scenario, there will be collateral damage — family members — and, of course, the family dog(s). The cops will lie about the raid and the “thin blue line” of cops, police departments or state police, and states attorney's office will circle the wagons to blame the victim(s). Since the victims are dead, they can't testify to the contrary, and the media will help in the cover-up because it furthers their agenda. The media will conveniently leave out facts (or misreport them) to protect the murdering cops. They will paint the victims as some crazy, anti-social, gun nut psychos who were killed resisting the forces of law and order. As far as the media is concerned, they will do everything they can to intimidate and terrorize the citizenry.

The Rule of Law will be replaced by the Law of the Jungle when the first innocents die. The other casualty will be Truth; it died along with the innocent victims of the raid.

There will be a lot of citizens that will be terrorized into compliance, but there will be the three percent that are not and they will strike back. The war is on and the attrition begins. The state politicians will not back off; they will order more terror to force compliance and the result will be more innocents’ deaths. When the cops start getting killed obeying the politician's illegal orders, that's going to be a wake up call; you've gotta be alive to collect a pension. Other cops will refuse these orders and become outlaws in the eyes of the political bosses and media. Other cops will intensify their lust for more innocent blood.

When the politicians who ordered these enforcement actions start dying, then they start realizing the kind of hornets nest they've raised. The same thing will apply when the TV talking heads and newspaper editors get taken down; ditto collaborators in the legal system. How does this play out? I don't know, but I can tell you that guerrilla wars are very ugly things. The gun grabbers will quit only when it become obvious to them that their actions mean certain death sooner or later. Only then will the killing stop.

For a historical frame of reference, think of the members of the French Resistance and their fight against the German occupation during WW2. It was a very dirty war in the shadows and it lasted for four years.

[faithhopecharity]

Since the primary purpose of the second amendment right to keep and bear arms... is to provide the people with the ability to defend against exactly this precise kind of tyranny, that being a government that attempts to disarm the citizens .......the consequences -- that being that the citizens will use their arms in precisely this intended manner, shooting back before submitting or permitting their confiscation....just like the Founders of our Republic did when the British King tried to confiscate or outlaw private arms ownership in America (its just history, is all, and history can and oft does repeat itself... because subsequent generations frequently make the same or similar mistakes over and over again). The Founders knew that private arms can also be used for things like protection against crime, and that the widespread dispersion of arms ownership tends to reduce the incidence of crimes, and that arms can be used for hunting for food, etc., and that arms can serve as a deterrent against foreign invasion of America, etc. But, the primary consideration of the Founders of America was against the possible eventual imposition of a tyranny by the federal government (thus, of limited enumerated powers only and with several additional structural features to limit the danger of it growing into a dictatorship)... the main idea was to protect in all possible ways against this from happening. "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ― James Madison, Federalist Papers Wherever the real power in a Government lies, there is the danger of oppression. In our Governments, the real power lies in the majority of the Community, and the invasion of private rights is chiefly to be apprehended, not from the acts of Government contrary to the sense of its constituents, but from acts in which the Government is the mere instrument of the major number of the constituents.” ― James Madison, Letters and Other Writings of James Madison Volume 3 "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them." - George Mason "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe." - Noah Webster "A government resting on the minority is an aristocracy, not a Republic, and could not be safe with a numerical and physical force against it, without a standing army, an enslaved press and a disarmed populace." - James Madison "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun." - Patrick Henry "This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - St. George Tucker "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them." - Joseph Story "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." - Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts

[Sergio]

bkmk

[ThunderSleeps]

For a historical frame of reference, think of the members of the French Resistance and their fight against the German occupation during WW2. It was a very dirty war in the shadows and it lasted for four years.

Look at Iraq for the past 10+ years. There are tens of thousands of veterans home now who have first-hand knowledge of insurgencies. Some will fall on both sides of this issue. If the gun-grabbing fascists push (and it looks like they are of a mind to try it) then I expect we'll see the same kinds of ambushes and other mayhem here, in America, that we've seen in Iraq.

It's not the lone guy hold up in his house yelling "Molon Labe!" at the police outside that lawmakers, swat, and others need to fear. It is the dozens of guys that aren't even on their radar yet... The guys that are doing intel work, recon, and tracking them to where they live... It would be a huge, devastating mistake for the gun-grabbers to think that the pro freedom, pro Constitution forces would be isolated and fighting only a defensive battle. I mention this only because I want them thinking just how ugly this could get. Don't push the patriots.

[RC one]

ready, aim, FIRE.

[Secret Agent Man]

that’s why they got those desensitizing, unusual white folks’ targets.