Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Government's New Way Of Calculating GDP: Would become 3% bigger due to a change in statistics
Seeking Alpha ^ | 04/24/2013

Posted on 03/01/2014 5:32:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind

In March 2013, the U.S. government invented a new way of calculating GDP. The Financial Times reported that starting from July 2013, U.S. GDP would become 3% bigger due to a change in statistics. As this adjustment in GDP calculation is pretty significant, I will discuss the new items in the U.S. GDP, what the consequences are and how investors should act on this revision in statistics.

GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or

The government made a significant change in the gross investment number (I), which now includes R&D spending, art, music, film royalties, books, theatre. This change in GDP statistics has not been implemented elsewhere in the world. So the U.S. is the first to accomplish this rewriting of the GDP number.

Research and development (R&D) spending, which shouldn't even be accounted for as investment, adds a significant amount to the U.S. GDP number. It accounts for around 2% of U.S. GDP. Art, music, film royalties, books and theatre add another 0.5% to U.S. GDP. Another adjustment has been made to pension accounting. Previously, pension spending was included in GDP. After this adjustment however, we also look at the "promise" to pay out pensions. So we are talking about imaginary numbers that are now included in GDP. A last example is found in real estate. Commissions, legal bills and expenditures on real estate transactions are included in GDP as "investment." Obviously these expenditures aren't associated with real production.

(Excerpt) Read more at seekingalpha.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gdp; gdpformula; government

1 posted on 03/01/2014 5:32:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, they’re adding things to the GDP whose addition to the economy are DUBIOUS at best ( e.g. writing a book ).

Of course this is going to have the effect of INFLATING GDP upwards (e.g. debt to GDP ration will now look better than it would be ).

And let’s not forget.... the total stock market index valuation depends on the GDP number. Anyone surprised to see our S$P 500 reaching all time highs?

And of course, the lamesteam media will probably tout that the economy is improving and react positively....


2 posted on 03/01/2014 5:39:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This goes hand-in-hand with 5-year plans. CCCP and China, we officially join your ranks.


3 posted on 03/01/2014 5:43:58 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hogwart’s Math, it appears. Don’t like the number? Change the calculation until you get the outcome you want. 0bamanomics in action.

Got my first accounting job when the interviewer asked, “What’s one plus one?” My answer?

“What do you want it to be?”


4 posted on 03/01/2014 5:53:34 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The variable G directly equates with a geometrically modified percentage of I that isn't seen in the summation.

We all believe that if is best to not tamper with I, as the negative component of it, used wholly to make G, has waste built into the process.

GOP is a useless growth indicator.

5 posted on 03/01/2014 6:06:46 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
GOP is a useless growth indicator.

Freudian slip? :-) Anyway, I agree.

6 posted on 03/01/2014 6:18:02 AM PST by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Awwwwww! Isn't that cute.

More of the government's Fun-with-Numbers series. The BLS has been doing that for years. Government has been playing with inflation numbers for decades.

Team Obama and the Dems are also good at Fun-with-Numbers. Whenever they need a number, they just SWAG it. They have done it so much that they don't even need petroleum jelly any more. They don't even have to worry about being called on it, because they know their friends in the media will go along with them.
7 posted on 03/01/2014 6:36:13 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
0bamanomics in action.

True, but it has been going on long before Obamanomics. It goes back decades.
8 posted on 03/01/2014 6:38:02 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmark.


9 posted on 03/01/2014 6:45:26 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds like the new “hedonism adjustment” they`re now using for inflation.


10 posted on 03/01/2014 7:22:59 AM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is how GDP will be calculated:

GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports)

But this is how it will be reported by the media:

GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports) + wishful thinking

What is really handy about this measure is that the media can add a positive wishful thinking premium when the Democrats are in the presidency and use a negative wishful thinking discount when Republicans are in office. This saves having to constantly retool the GDP calculation.

11 posted on 03/01/2014 9:42:52 AM PST by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

Sometimes the cellphone knows best... I seriously dislike the last Android “update”.


12 posted on 03/01/2014 8:09:38 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson