Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the dog’s ‘collar bone’ vestigial?
Creation Ministries International ^ | 2-27-2014 | Philip Bell

Posted on 02/27/2014 11:14:06 AM PST by fishtank

Is the dog’s ‘collar bone’ vestigial?

by Philip Bell

Published: 27 February 2014 (GMT+10)

In comparison to human beings, dogs have a rather different shoulder design, and the same applies to many other carnivorous and hoofed animals too, such as and cats and horses. The shoulder bones appear somewhat disconnected from the rest of the skeleton and dogs don’t have the obvious collar bone (clavicle) that we humans have. The tiny canine clavicle has a variety of sizes and shapes in adult dogs1 and some evolutionists have argued that it is rudimentary; implying that it’s now a largely ‘useless leftover’ from an earlier stage in canine evolution. But claims of it being vestigial don’t stack up. Together with other parts of the shoulder anatomy (termed the ‘clavicular complex’), the clavicle plays an important role in canine locomotion.

Evolutionary claims

Arguments for vestiges invariably turn out to be arguments from ignorance or they reveal faith in evolution in the teeth of contrary evidence. Therefore, regarding the canine clavicle we must peel away the rhetoric to find out what is known about its function. To pre-empt the accusation that creationists misunderstand or misrepresent the evolutionary argument about vestiges, we’ll first mention a recent promulgation of this argument by University of Chicago professor Jerry Coyne in his Why Evolution is True: “A trait can be vestigial and functional at the same time. It is not vestigial because it’s functionless, but because it no longer performs the function for which it evolved” (emphasis in original).2

However, this begs the question, for unless it can be empirically established that a trait is vestigial and shown to have once served a different role, the prior ‘function’ is just a statement of faith.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; dog; vestigial

CMI article images.

1 posted on 02/27/2014 11:14:07 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Article excerpted. Full text at link.


2 posted on 02/27/2014 11:14:29 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

So how do they know its a ‘leftover’ or evolution? ;-)


3 posted on 02/27/2014 11:17:06 AM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I love frisbee dogs. BTT


4 posted on 02/27/2014 11:18:48 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

But I really don’t like slobbering Rottweilers (top photo).


5 posted on 02/27/2014 11:35:19 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

haha


6 posted on 02/27/2014 11:35:30 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Easy to find out. Remove it from 100 dogs and see how they get along.


7 posted on 02/27/2014 11:48:30 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank; shibumi
How dogs used to look before their collar bones became vestigial;


8 posted on 02/27/2014 11:51:36 AM PST by Salamander (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
I'm dubious about vestigial organs. The human appendix was once considered a vestigial organ. It turns out the human appendix is a very important part of the body's immune system. We need to be careful about defining away something just because we don't understand what it does.
9 posted on 02/27/2014 3:41:46 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Didn’t Johann Sebastian Bach write some music for well-tempered clavicles?


10 posted on 02/27/2014 4:06:13 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Didn’t Johann Sebastian Bach write some music for well-tempered clavicles?

No, the music was for the ill-tempered clavintrude.

11 posted on 02/27/2014 4:22:04 PM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson