The question at large is, when the state moves to confiscate - and a few individuals are publicly targeted and made examples of - will America shrug and say ‘ It’s just one extremist who refused to comply with the law’ - or will that become the moment resistance become an imperative?
Will America just bow to yet another court ruling that says we must comply with whatever ‘laws’ are passed ‘for the good of the public’ and say - well, that’s the law.?
I’m not holding my breath.
For if our right to religious freedom and exercise and our right to keep and bear arms can be so easily trampled and regulated without much of a fight - what other thing could possibly galvanize a people to resistance?
“...The question at large is, when the state moves to confiscate -...will that become the moment resistance become an imperative?...”
I totally get that. On the same page.
And I’ll submit that the other side is doing this EXACTLY for that same reason - to see what they can still get away with and how far they can push.
I have no illusions about it, brother.