To: Arrowhead1952
Maybe but the women in this case want a divorce that Texas tells them they don’t even need to separate here.
It ISN’T about 2 people who love each other. It’s about two bitter homos who are trying to challenge the state and are willing to remain “partners” just long enough to do so.
117 posted on
02/28/2014 9:48:38 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: a fool in paradise
the USSC has ruled, in essence, their is a contittional right to love or rather sexual satisfaction. There was never a love or sexual acrobatic test in marriage prior to the USSC ruling on DOMA.
118 posted on
02/28/2014 10:12:33 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: a fool in paradise
It ISNT about 2 people who love each other. Its about two bitter homos who are trying to challenge the state and are willing to remain partners just long enough to do so. The homos are trying to forward their agenda in every state, especially deep red states. Just look up articles on Ronnie Earle in Travis county. That sob was as queer as a $3.00 bill. Most articles have likely been scrubbed from the web by now.
119 posted on
02/28/2014 4:27:08 PM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson