Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

the USSC has ruled, in essence, their is a contittional right to love or rather sexual satisfaction. There was never a love or sexual acrobatic test in marriage prior to the USSC ruling on DOMA.


118 posted on 02/28/2014 10:12:33 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

They aren’t seeking love or attraction, they are seeking a divorce for a marriage that this state doesn’t even recognize. They are free to separate and seek legal disbursement by third party if they wish.


120 posted on 02/28/2014 5:55:27 PM PST by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson