Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickensoup

No Rodham any more?


4 posted on 02/24/2014 9:49:16 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

No Rodham any more?

_______________

Nope. Hillary Clinton. Control the discourse.


5 posted on 02/24/2014 9:50:05 AM PST by Chickensoup (leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

I remember in 1991 when Bill Clinton was elected to office. About 3.7 milliseconds after the results were found to be in Clinton’s favor, the media was on fire about “Hillary Rodham Clinton”, a name we had never heard before, and suddenly they began to talk about her as a co-president, which was another concept we had never heard before. I am sure Rush probably did a post election montage of “Hillary Rodham Clinton”.


37 posted on 02/24/2014 10:06:46 AM PST by BRK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk
Not until she is elected to the presidency.
Then it will be just Hillary Rodham.
66 posted on 02/24/2014 10:43:41 AM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson