The reason Zippo and company kept repeating over and over that the video protest caused the attack is nothing more than a cheap attorney’s trick that is commonly used on juries to manipulate their thinking.
It’s called “conditioned response”.
During a trial an attorney will make an obviously false or misleading statement and repeat the same thing to the jury over and over never expecting the jury to believe it, instead the attorney wants the jury to know it isn’t true and come to their own conclusion what the truth is ultimately leading the jury to a false conclusion.
In this case they repeated over and over the video protest caused the attack so the American people, which would be the jury, would come to the conclusion THERE WAS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN THE VIDEO PROTEST AND THE ATTACK.
The truth is the attack was planned THEN the protest in Egypt was planned for the purpose of CREATING the spontaneous lie.
Stevens and company were never supposed to be killed they were supposed to be taken hostage just like what happened during Carters term.
With the “media” being 90% of the preparation for the battle, just look for an orchestrated news story that fits with the “hostage” story.
The orchestrated news story is simple.
Immediately prior to the attack the dems. praised Jimmy Carter at their convention.
The republicans obviously compared Zippo to Jimmy Carter.
Hillary’s plan was simple. She was going to recreate the “October Surprise”.
They planned the attack, where Stevens and company were supposed to be taken hostage.
Then they planned the protest in Egypt to create the “spontaneous’ lie that the attack was because of the video.
Nobody was ever supposed to believe the “spontaneous” lie, instead Hillary’s rumor mill would start a campaign that Mitt Romney and the republicans had collaborated with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Jimmy Carter.
The republicans would then be put in the position to come up with some acceptable story for the American people to counter Hillary’s rumor mill that repubs had collaborated with terrorist and planned the attack.
They couldn’t tell the truth that it was Hillary collaborating with terrorist and planned the attack because they would end up sounding like Hillary’s rumor mill nuts.
The story the repubs were supposed to come up with
The terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist are simply picking up on news stories, in this case dems praising Jimmy Carter, and planning an attack around the news story in a relatively short period of time.
It would be the republicans that came up with the explanation as to why a terrorist attack always follows when the dems. drag out R King and gin up civil unrest.
The main reason for needing to create an explanation for the terrorist following the dems talking points is the attempted car bomb in NYC in 2010.
The dems had started a talking points campaign, which was also echoed by the MSM, that the TEA Party were a bunch of ultra violent, right wing extremist, racist, Tim McVeigh wannabes out to overthrow the govt.
Not too long after the dems started there talking points campaign against the TEA Party there was the attempted car bombing in NYC.
The bomb was a fertilizer bomb like Tim McVeigh used, so the left all jumped with joy and proclaimed their talking points about the TEA Party being a bunch of Tim McVeigh wannabes was correct.
There is 4 possibilities
1. The dems orchestrated the talking points/news for the attack to blame the TEA Party for the attack.
2. The terrorist are so in tune with the news they picked up on the dems talking points in the news and planned the attack accordingly.
3. The TEA Party actually did it.
4. It all one giant coincidence the terrorist matched the dems talking points in planning the attack.
Had Benghazi gone as planned, the republicans would have ended up explaining it away for the dems with choice #2.
Making the claim the terrorist are simply picking up on the news and in a relatively short period of time planning an attack.
Hillary’s rumor mill would stick with choice #3, the TEA Party collaborated with the terrorist and did it.
Benghazi is nothing more complicated than a 2bit attorneys strategy at CYA that she is collaborating with terrorist to kill Americans as her path to power.
Above it all the truth remains that when Hilary diverted the plane bringing the bodies back from Benghazi for her photo op media event at Andrews AFB, she looked the parents of the slain Americans in the eye and told them they would put their full effort into prosecuting the video maker. In other words, she pledged to violate his constitutional rights to promote her scam.
Above it all the truth remains that when Hilary diverted the plane bringing the bodies back from Benghazi for her photo op media event at Andrews AFB, she looked the parents of the slain Americans in the eye and told them they would put their full effort into prosecuting the video maker. In other words, she pledged to violate his constitutional rights to promote her scam.