Crucifying Thomas Sowell for writing his opinion on how we should proceed against socialism is a marked sign you have gone wrong.
Disagreeing is not attacking.
‘Attacking’ in this case is a word used to do nothing more than stir emotions.
Sowell posted that we should take a different path.
Post the exact words of the so called attacks that Sowell made if you can.
Sorry, do your own damn homework.
Here's a better idea. Why don't you post the exact words that exculpate Sowell?
But I will say that the WWII analogy Sowell used in his latest column was rather poor:
1) I don't believe Cruz is fighting a war he can't win.
2) The state of the GOPe is not like Dunkirk.
3) The GOPe has never really fought the Dems.
4) I don't believe the GOPe is waiting for a war that it can win because there has been no evidence for nearly the last 20 years that the GOPe leadership will EVER stand up and fight the Dems.
I think a more apt WWII analogy is that if conservatives do as Sowell suggests and leave the GOPe leadership alone and wait for the GOPe to lead the fight to repeal Obamacare and fight the Dem agenda, it would be like the Allies waiting for Vichy France to take the lead in defeating Hitler.
Sorry, you might be able to sell that tripe if Sowell wrote just one column in a vacuum. Sowell wrote 3 consecutive pieces "disagreeing" with Cruz. And Sowell did so amidst a flurry of Establishment GOP columnists that all had roughly the same "Gravitas" messaging.
To me, that constitutes malice, intent and coordination.
One Team, One fight, gentlemen...
The Leftards hate us ALL equally.
Agree to disagree, and disagree cordially.